TSTP Solution File: SYN037-2 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN037-2 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:24:13 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31467/SYN/SYN037-2+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ...................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 0] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 8] [nf = 3] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 24] [nf = 7] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 75] [nf = 20] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 161] [nf = 49] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 338] [nf = 111] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 706] [nf = 212] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1473] [nf = 437] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2834] [nf = 886] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5564] [nf = 1743] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11102] [nf = 3315] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21796] [nf = 6623] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 41853] [nf = 13076] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 81944] [nf = 25203] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 161547] [nf = 48768] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 313702] [nf = 96538] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 607617] [nf = 188612] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 1191220] [nf = 364260] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 7 secs [nr = 2333137] [nf = 711429] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 13 secs [nr = 4529278] [nf = 1398792] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 25 secs [nr = 8821311] [nf = 2721659] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 49 secs [nr = 17277920] [nf = 5283469] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 98 secs [nr = 33724523] [nf = 10343973] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567455] [nf = 12792336] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567463] [nf = 12792339] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567479] [nf = 12792343] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567530] [nf = 12792356] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567616] [nf = 12792385] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41567793] [nf = 12792447] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41568161] [nf = 12792548] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41568928] [nf = 12792773] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41570289] [nf = 12793222] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41573019] [nf = 12794079] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41578557] [nf = 12795651] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41589251] [nf = 12798959] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41609308] [nf = 12805412] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 41649399] [nf = 12817539] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41729002] [nf = 12841104] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking
% for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 41881157] [nf = 12888874] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 42175072] [nf = 12980948] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 42758675] [nf = 13156596] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 19 ...
% t = 129 secs [nr = 43900592] [nf = 13503765] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 20 ...
% t = 135 secs [nr = 46096733] [nf = 14191128] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 21 ...
% t = 148 secs [nr = 50388766] [nf = 15513995] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 22 ...
% t = 172 secs [nr = 58845375] [nf = 18075805] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 23 ...
% t = 220 secs [nr = 75291978] [nf = 23136309] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 24 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 134843366
% resolvents: 103076642 factors: 31766724
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% Total = 0
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 47870107 [3] = 86973259
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] m1 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] m2 (+)0 (-)0
% [2] m3 (+)0 (-)0
% [3] p_1 (+)0 (-)0
% [4] q_1 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)0 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 0
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 55786956
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 91509843
% Number of successful unifications: 134843366
% Number of unification failures: 12760451
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 258088236
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 598005187
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 16
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 0
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: nan
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 49
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 147603817
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 449478
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------