TSTP Solution File: SYN036-4 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SYN036-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:17 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 167.53s 167.71s
% Output   : Refutation 167.53s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SYN036-4 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:21:35 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.38  Tue Jul 12 01:21:35 2022
% 0.22/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 4635.
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  list(usable).
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy
% 0.22/0.38  will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.22/0.38  factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.38  
% 0.22/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.39/0.62  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.39/0.62  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.39/0.62  number of clauses in intial UL: 52
% 0.39/0.62  number of clauses initially in problem: 56
% 0.39/0.62  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 92
% 0.39/0.62  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.39/0.62  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.39/0.62  absolute distinct symbol count: 8
% 0.39/0.62     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.39/0.62     distinct function count: 4
% 0.39/0.62     distinct constant count: 2
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  
% 0.39/0.62  =========== start of search ===========
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  -- HEY sandbox, WE HAVE A PROOF!! -- 
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 167.32 sec ----> 161 [hyper,160,52,155,155,160] {-} $F.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  Length of proof is 35.  Level of proof is 19.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 167.53/167.71  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 167.53/167.71  % SZS output start Refutation
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  1 [] {+} -p(cx)| -q(cw)|p(A)|q(B).
% 167.53/167.71  2 [] {+} -p(cx)| -q(A)|p(B)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  3 [] {+} -p(A)| -q(cw)|p(cx)|q(B).
% 167.53/167.71  5 [] {+} -p(cx)| -p(A)| -p(fy5(A))| -q(cw)|q(B).
% 167.53/167.71  6 [] {+} -p(cx)| -p(A)| -p(fy5(A))| -q(B)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  7 [] {+} -p(cx)| -q(cw)| -q(A)| -q(fz5(A))|p(B).
% 167.53/167.71  10 [] {+} -p(cx)|p(A)|q(cw)|q(B)|q(fz(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  13 [] {-} -p(A)| -p(fy5(B))| -q(C)|p(D)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  14 [copy,13,factor_simp] {+} -p(fy5(A))| -q(B)|p(C)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  15 [] {+} -p(A)| -q(B)|p(C)|p(fy5(C))|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  16 [] {+} -p(A)|p(cx)|q(cw)|q(B)|q(fz(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  17 [] {+} -p(A)| -q(cw)| -q(B)| -q(fz5(B))|p(cx).
% 167.53/167.71  20 [] {+} -q(cw)|p(cx)|p(A)|p(fy(A))|q(B).
% 167.53/167.71  21 [] {+} -q(A)|p(cx)|p(B)|p(fy(B))|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  23 [] {+} -p(cx)| -p(A)| -p(fy(A))|q(cw)|q(B)|q(fz(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  24 [] {+} -p(cx)| -p(A)| -p(fy5(A))| -q(cw)| -q(B)| -q(fz5(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  31 [] {+} -q(cw)| -q(A)| -q(fz(A))|p(cx)|p(B)|p(fy(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  33 [factor,5.1.2] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy5(cx))| -q(cw)|q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  34 [factor,6.1.2] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy5(cx))| -q(A)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  35 [factor,7.2.3] {+} -p(cx)| -q(cw)| -q(fz5(cw))|p(A).
% 167.53/167.71  36 [factor,10.3.4] {+} -p(cx)|p(A)|q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  37 [factor,16.3.4] {+} -p(A)|p(cx)|q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  38 [factor,17.2.3] {+} -p(A)| -q(cw)| -q(fz5(cw))|p(cx).
% 167.53/167.71  39 [factor,20.2.3] {+} -q(cw)|p(cx)|p(fy(cx))|q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  40 [factor,21.2.3] {+} -q(A)|p(cx)|p(fy(cx))|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  42 [factor,23.1.2] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy(cx))|q(cw)|q(A)|q(fz(A)).
% 167.53/167.71  44 [factor,24.1.2] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy5(cx))| -q(cw)| -q(A)| -q(fz5(A)).
% 167.53/167.71  48 [factor,31.1.2] {+} -q(cw)| -q(fz(cw))|p(cx)|p(A)|p(fy(A)).
% 167.53/167.71  51 [factor,42.3.4] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy(cx))|q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  52 [factor,44.3.4] {+} -p(cx)| -p(fy5(cx))| -q(cw)| -q(fz5(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  53 [factor,48.3.4] {+} -q(cw)| -q(fz(cw))|p(cx)|p(fy(cx)).
% 167.53/167.71  54 [] {-} p(cx)|p(A)|p(fy5(A))|q(cw)|q(B)|q(fz5(B)).
% 167.53/167.71  55 [factor,54.1.2] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|q(cw)|q(A)|q(fz5(A)).
% 167.53/167.71  57 [factor,55.3.4] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|q(cw)|q(fz5(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  64 [hyper,54,40,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(A)|p(fy5(A))|q(cw)|p(fy(cx)).
% 167.53/167.71  74 [factor,64.1.2] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|q(cw)|p(fy(cx)).
% 167.53/167.71  85 [hyper,74,39,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|p(fy(cx))|q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  86 [hyper,85,53,85,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|p(fy(cx)).
% 167.53/167.71  95 [hyper,86,15,57,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  105 [hyper,95,3,86,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx))|q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  107 [hyper,105,38,86,105,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|p(fy5(cx)).
% 167.53/167.71  110 [hyper,107,37,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  124 [hyper,110,14,107,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  135 [hyper,124,3,107,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx)|q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  138 [hyper,135,38,107,135,factor_simp,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(cx).
% 167.53/167.71  139 [hyper,138,36] {-} p(A)|q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  150 [hyper,139,2,138,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(A)|q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  154 [hyper,150,1,138,factor_simp] {-} p(A)|q(B).
% 167.53/167.71  155 [hyper,154,35,138,154,factor_simp,factor_simp] {-} p(A).
% 167.53/167.71  156 [hyper,155,51,155] {-} q(cw)|q(fz(cw)).
% 167.53/167.71  159 [hyper,156,34,155,155,factor_simp] {-} q(cw).
% 167.53/167.71  160 [hyper,159,33,155,155] {-} q(A).
% 167.53/167.71  161 [hyper,160,52,155,155,160] {-} $F.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  % SZS output end Refutation
% 167.53/167.71  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  ============ end of search ============
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 167.53/167.71  
% 167.53/167.71  Process 4635 finished Tue Jul 12 01:24:23 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------