TSTP Solution File: SYN033-1 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:28:12 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.70s 0.92s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.70s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 12 ( 8 unt; 0 nHn; 7 RR)
% Number of literals : 21 ( 0 equ; 11 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause3,axiom,
( p(X6,X5,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p(X4,X5,X2)
| ~ p(X1,X4,X6) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1rWCMpJoMV/E---3.1_27124.p',clause3) ).
cnf(clause2,axiom,
p(X1,h(X1,X2),X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1rWCMpJoMV/E---3.1_27124.p',clause2) ).
cnf(clause1,axiom,
p(g(X1,X2),X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1rWCMpJoMV/E---3.1_27124.p',clause1) ).
cnf(prove_something,negated_conjecture,
~ p(k(X1),X1,k(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1rWCMpJoMV/E---3.1_27124.p',prove_something) ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
( p(X6,X5,X3)
| ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ p(X4,X5,X2)
| ~ p(X1,X4,X6) ),
clause3 ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
p(X1,h(X1,X2),X2),
clause2 ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( p(X1,h(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ p(X5,X2,X1)
| ~ p(X5,X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
p(g(X1,X2),X1,X2),
clause1 ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( p(X1,h(X2,X3),X4)
| ~ p(g(X2,X1),X3,X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ p(k(X1),X1,k(X1)),
prove_something ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
p(X1,h(X2,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.11 % Problem : SYN033-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.31 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.12/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.31 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:13:34 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.41 Running first-order model finding
% 0.17/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.1rWCMpJoMV/E---3.1_27124.p
% 0.70/0.92 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.70/0.92 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.70/0.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 27225 completed with status 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.70/0.92 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.70/0.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.70/0.92 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.70/0.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27229 completed with status 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.70/0.92 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.70/0.92 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.70/0.92 # Search class: FHUNS-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.70/0.92 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.70/0.92 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.70/0.92 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.70/0.92 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 # Proof found!
% 0.70/0.92 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.70/0.92 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.70/0.92 # Parsed axioms : 4
% 0.70/0.92 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Initial clauses : 4
% 0.70/0.92 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Initial clauses in saturation : 4
% 0.70/0.92 # Processed clauses : 13
% 0.70/0.92 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # ...remaining for further processing : 13
% 0.70/0.92 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Generated clauses : 12
% 0.70/0.92 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 7
% 0.70/0.92 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Paramodulations : 12
% 0.70/0.92 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # NegExts : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.70/0.92 # Current number of processed clauses : 9
% 0.70/0.92 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.70/0.92 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.70/0.92 # Non-unit-clauses : 5
% 0.70/0.92 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2
% 0.70/0.92 # ...number of literals in the above : 3
% 0.70/0.92 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.70/0.92 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9
% 0.70/0.92 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.70/0.92 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.70/0.92 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.70/0.92 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.70/0.92 # Termbank termtop insertions : 236
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.92 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.70/0.92 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.70/0.92 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.70/0.92 # Maximum resident set size: 1588 pages
% 0.70/0.92
% 0.70/0.92 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.70/0.92 # User time : 0.007 s
% 0.70/0.92 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.70/0.92 # Total time : 0.011 s
% 0.70/0.92 # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.70/0.92 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------