TSTP Solution File: SYN031-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN031-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:44 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.64s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SYN031-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 19:09:20 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.58 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 % Transform :cnf
% 0.20/0.64 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.20/0.64 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.64 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % File : SYN031-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.20/0.64 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.20/0.64 % Problem : MQW
% 0.20/0.64 % Version : Especial.
% 0.20/0.64 % English :
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Refs : [MRS72] Michie et al. (1972), G-deduction
% 0.20/0.64 % : [WM76] Wilson & Minker (1976), Resolution, Refinements, and S
% 0.20/0.64 % Source : [SPRFN]
% 0.20/0.64 % Names : MQW [MRS72]
% 0.20/0.64 % : MQW [WM76]
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.64 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.20/0.64 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 5 ( 0 unt; 2 nHn; 3 RR)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of literals : 10 ( 0 equ; 4 neg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal clause size : 2 ( 2 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of predicates : 1 ( 1 usr; 0 prp; 2-2 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of functors : 2 ( 2 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% 0.20/0.64 % Number of variables : 8 ( 3 sgn)
% 0.20/0.64 % SPC : CNF_UNS_RFO_NEQ_NHN
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 % Comments :
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause1,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( g(A,a)
% 0.20/0.64 | g(f(A),A) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause2,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( g(A,a)
% 0.20/0.64 | g(A,f(A)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause3,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ g(A,B)
% 0.20/0.64 | g(f(B),B) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(clause4,axiom,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ g(A,B)
% 0.20/0.64 | g(B,f(B)) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 cnf(theorem,negated_conjecture,
% 0.20/0.64 ( ~ g(A,B)
% 0.20/0.64 | ~ g(B,a) ) ).
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.64 % Proof found
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.64 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.20/0.64 %ClaNum:5(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.20/0.64 %VarNum:17(SingletonVarNum:8)
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxLitNum:2
% 0.20/0.64 %MaxfuncDepth:1
% 0.20/0.64 %SharedTerms:1
% 0.20/0.64 %goalClause: 3
% 0.20/0.64 [1]P1(x11,f2(x11))+P1(x11,a1)
% 0.20/0.64 [2]P1(f2(x21),x21)+P1(x21,a1)
% 0.20/0.64 [3]~P1(x31,x32)+~P1(x32,a1)
% 0.20/0.64 [4]~P1(x42,x41)+P1(x41,f2(x41))
% 0.20/0.64 [5]~P1(x52,x51)+P1(f2(x51),x51)
% 0.20/0.64 %EqnAxiom
% 0.20/0.64
% 0.20/0.64 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(6,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (~P1(f2(x61),a1)+P1(x61,a1)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,1])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P1(a1,f2(a1))+P1(f2(x71),x71)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,4])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P1(f2(x81),x81)+P1(f2(f2(a1)),f2(a1))),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,7])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(9,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (~P1(x91,x92)+~P1(f2(x92),a1)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[6,3])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(11,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (~P1(x111,f2(a1))+P1(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[3,2])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(12,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 (P1(a1,a1)),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[11,8])).
% 0.20/0.65 cnf(15,plain,
% 0.20/0.65 ($false),
% 0.20/0.65 inference(scs_inference,[],[12,9,3]),
% 0.20/0.65 ['proof']).
% 0.20/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.20/0.65 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------