TSTP Solution File: SYN029-1 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN029-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:19 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.29s 1.69s
% Output   : Refutation 1.29s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   10 (   4 unt;   1 nHn;  10 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   18 (   0 equ;   9 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   4 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ p
    | q ),
    file('SYN029-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ r
    | ~ q
    | p ),
    file('SYN029-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,plain,
    ( ~ q
    | ~ r
    | p ),
    inference(propositional,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[2])]),
    [iquote('copy,2,propositional')] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ p
    | ~ q ),
    file('SYN029-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( ~ q
    | ~ p ),
    inference(propositional,[status(thm)],[inference(copy,[status(thm)],[4])]),
    [iquote('copy,4,propositional')] ).

cnf(6,axiom,
    ( q
    | p ),
    file('SYN029-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(7,axiom,
    r,
    file('SYN029-1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    p,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[7,3,6]),
    [iquote('hyper,7,3,6')] ).

cnf(9,plain,
    q,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[8,1]),
    [iquote('hyper,8,1')] ).

cnf(10,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[9,5,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,9,5,8')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SYN029-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:06:39 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.29/1.69  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.29/1.69  The process was started by sandbox2 on n010.cluster.edu,
% 1.29/1.69  Wed Jul 27 11:06:39 2022
% 1.29/1.69  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 23601.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.29/1.69  set(auto).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.29/1.69  clear(print_given).
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  list(usable).
% 1.29/1.69  0 [] q|p.
% 1.29/1.69  0 [] -p|q.
% 1.29/1.69  0 [] -r| -q|p.
% 1.29/1.69  0 [] r.
% 1.29/1.69  0 [] -p| -q.
% 1.29/1.69  end_of_list.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  SCAN INPUT: prop=1, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  The clause set is propositional; the strategy will be
% 1.29/1.69  ordered hyperresolution with the propositional
% 1.29/1.69  optimizations, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(propositional).
% 1.29/1.69     dependent: set(sort_literals).
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ------------> process usable:
% 1.29/1.69  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 1 [] -p|q.
% 1.29/1.69  ** KEPT (pick-wt=3): 3 [copy,2,propositional] -q| -r|p.
% 1.29/1.69  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 5 [copy,4,propositional] -q| -p.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ------------> process sos:
% 1.29/1.69  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 6 [] q|p.
% 1.29/1.69  ** KEPT (pick-wt=1): 7 [] r.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 10 [hyper,9,5,8] $F.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  Length of proof is 4.  Level of proof is 3.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.29/1.69  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.29/1.69  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.29/1.69  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ============ end of search ============
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.29/1.69  clauses given                  4
% 1.29/1.69  clauses generated              3
% 1.29/1.69  clauses kept                   7
% 1.29/1.69  clauses forward subsumed       0
% 1.29/1.69  clauses back subsumed          3
% 1.29/1.69  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.29/1.69  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.29/1.69  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.29/1.69  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.29/1.69  
% 1.29/1.69  Process 23601 finished Wed Jul 27 11:06:41 2022
% 1.29/1.69  Otter interrupted
% 1.29/1.69  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------