TSTP Solution File: SYN013-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SYN013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 11:56:32 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.57s
% Output   : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   26
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   46 (  10 unt;  33 nHn;  44 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  122 (  79 equ;  21 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_1,negated_conjecture,
    m != n,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_1) ).

cnf(c_2,negated_conjecture,
    n != k,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_2) ).

cnf(c_3,negated_conjecture,
    k != m,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_3) ).

cnf(c_4,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = m
    | ~ element(X,m)
    | f(X) != m ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_4) ).

cnf(c_5,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = m
    | ~ element(X,m)
    | f(X) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_5) ).

cnf(c_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = m
    | ~ element(X,m)
    | element(X,f(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_6) ).

cnf(c_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = m
    | ~ element(X,m)
    | element(f(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_7) ).

cnf(c_8,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = m
    | element(X,m)
    | Y = m
    | Y = X
    | ~ element(X,Y)
    | ~ element(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_8) ).

cnf(c_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = n
    | element(X,n)
    | g(X) != n ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_9) ).

cnf(c_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = n
    | element(X,n)
    | g(X) != X ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_10) ).

cnf(c_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = n
    | element(X,n)
    | element(X,g(X)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_11) ).

cnf(c_12,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = n
    | element(X,n)
    | element(g(X),X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_12) ).

cnf(c_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = n
    | ~ element(X,n)
    | Y = n
    | Y = X
    | ~ element(X,Y)
    | ~ element(Y,X) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_13) ).

cnf(c_14,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = k
    | X != m
    | element(X,k) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_14) ).

cnf(c_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = k
    | X != n
    | element(X,k) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_15) ).

cnf(c_16,negated_conjecture,
    ( X = k
    | X = m
    | X = n
    | ~ element(X,k) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',c_16) ).

cnf(17,plain,
    element(m,k),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_14,c_3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(18,plain,
    element(n,k),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_15,c_2,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( element(k,n)
    | g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m
    | g(k) = n ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_16,c_12]),c_2]) ).

cnf(26,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m
    | g(k) = n
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,21,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m
    | g(k) = n ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_13,26,21,17]),c_3,c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(32,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m
    | element(k,n) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_9,30]),c_2]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,32,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | g(k) = m ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_13,33,32,17]),c_3,c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | element(k,n)
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[c_11,37,theory(equality)]),c_2]) ).

cnf(40,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,39,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(41,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | element(f(k),k) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_7,40]),c_3]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | element(k,f(k)) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_6,40]),c_3]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    ( g(k) = k
    | f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | f(k) = n ),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_16,41]) ).

cnf(49,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | f(k) = n
    | element(k,n) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_10,43]),c_2]) ).

cnf(50,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | f(k) = n
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,49,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | f(k) = n ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_13,50,49,17]),c_3,c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(58,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | g(k) = k
    | element(k,n) ),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[42,56,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(61,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | g(k) = k ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_13,58,40,17]),c_3,c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(62,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | element(k,n) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_10,61]),c_2]) ).

cnf(63,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,62,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(66,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | f(k) = m ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_13,63,62,17]),c_3,c_1,c_2]) ).

cnf(68,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | g(k) = k ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_4,66,40]),c_3]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | ~ element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[c_4,66,theory(equality)]),c_3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(70,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | element(k,n) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_10,68]),c_2]) ).

cnf(71,plain,
    ( f(k) = k
    | element(k,m) ),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,70,18]),c_2,c_1,c_3]) ).

cnf(73,plain,
    f(k) = k,
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[69,71]) ).

cnf(75,plain,
    ~ element(k,m),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_5,73,c_3]) ).

cnf(76,plain,
    g(k) = k,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[40,75]) ).

cnf(77,plain,
    element(k,n),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_10,76,c_2]) ).

cnf(78,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[c_8,77,c_3,c_1,c_2,18]),75]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SYN013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jul 11 17:13:49 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.47  * 
% 0.19/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  "."
% 0.19/0.48  * 
% 0.19/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T17:13:49
% 0.19/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-07-11T17:13:49
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  #||
% 0.37/0.57  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.57  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.57  ||#
% 0.37/0.57  
% 0.37/0.57  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.57  ;       314 formulas have been input or derived (from 57 formulas).
% 0.37/0.57  ;        78 (25%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.37/0.57  ;           44 (56%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.57  ;           34 (44%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.57  ; 
% 0.37/0.57  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Assert                       (16 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.014  16%   Process new row              (268 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.015  17%   Resolution                   (112 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.004   4%   Paramodulation               (56 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Factoring                    (36 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Condensing                   (119 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.004   4%   Forward subsumption          (119 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.004   4%   Backward subsumption         (68 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Clause clause subsumption    (172 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.009  10%   Forward simplification       (240 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.001   1%   Backward simplification      (78 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.003   3%   Ordering                     (1,290 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.026  29%   Other
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.089        Total
% 0.37/0.57  ;     0.094        Real time
% 0.37/0.57  ; 
% 0.37/0.57  ; Term-hash-array has 71 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 24 entries (37 at peak, 68 added, 44 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 112 nodes (172 at peak, 313 added, 201 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ;  Retrieved 308 possibly forward subsuming rows in 119 calls.
% 0.37/0.57  ;  Retrieved 55 possibly backward subsumed rows in 68 calls.
% 0.37/0.57  ; Path-index has 61 entries (72 at peak, 106 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ; Path-index has 65 nodes (71 at peak, 86 added, 21 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ; Trie-index has 61 entries (72 at peak, 106 added, 45 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ; Trie-index has 107 nodes (127 at peak, 172 added, 65 deleted).
% 0.37/0.57  ; Retrieved 267 generalization terms in 1,037 calls.
% 0.37/0.57  ; Retrieved 9 instance terms in 9 calls.
% 0.37/0.57  ; Retrieved 2,237 unifiable terms in 699 calls.
% 0.37/0.57  ; 
% 0.37/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to process has 7 entries:
% 0.37/0.57  ;     1 with value 14              2 with value 26               2 with value 38
% 0.37/0.57  ;     1 with value 18              1 with value 30
% 0.37/0.57  ; The agenda of rows to give has 5 entries:
% 0.37/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 27)          1 with value (4 51)           1 with value (4 58)
% 0.37/0.57  ;     1 with value (4 37)          1 with value (4 52)
% 0.37/0.57  Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.57    0.095 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.57    0.07919 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.57    0.015809 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.57    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.57    0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.57    7,128,504 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.57  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-11T17:13:49
% 0.37/0.57  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.57  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------