TSTP Solution File: SYN012-1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SYN012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 12:09:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12 % Problem : SYN012-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.1.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 01:13:27 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n012.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Tue Jul 12 01:13:27 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 3409.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This is a non-Horn set without equality. The strategy
% 0.13/0.36 will be ordered hyper_res, ur_res, unit deletion, and
% 0.13/0.36 factoring, with satellites in sos and nuclei in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.13/0.40 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.13/0.40 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.13/0.40 number of clauses initially in problem: 7
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 71
% 0.13/0.40 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 100
% 0.13/0.40 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.13/0.40 absolute distinct symbol count: 3
% 0.13/0.40 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.13/0.40 distinct function count: 1
% 0.13/0.40 distinct constant count: 0
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.13/0.40
% 0.13/0.40 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 -------- PROOF --------
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 3 [ 2 0 146 ] (0.00 seconds, 4242 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 4 [ 4 1 99 ] (0.00 seconds, 15108 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 5 [ 4 1 493 ] (0.00 seconds, 15099 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 6 [ 18 1 730 ] (0.00 seconds, 2011 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Model 7 [ 6 0 204 ] (0.00 seconds, 7271 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at 0.14 sec ----> 77 [hyper,66,5,66] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Length of proof is 8. Level of proof is 8.
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 1 [] {+} -big_f(A,B)| -big_f(A,g(A,B))|big_g(B,g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 2 [] {+} -big_f(A,B)|big_f(A,g(A,B))| -big_g(B,g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 3 [] {+} -big_f(A,B)| -big_f(g(A,B),g(A,B))|big_g(g(A,B),g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 4 [] {+} big_f(A,B)| -big_g(g(A,B),g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 5 [] {+} -big_g(A,B)| -big_g(g(A,B),g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 6 [] {+} big_f(A,B)|big_f(g(A,B),g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 7 [] {-} big_g(A,B)|big_g(g(A,B),g(A,B)).
% 0.20/0.53 15 [hyper,7,4] {-} big_g(A,B)|big_f(A,B).
% 0.20/0.53 18 [hyper,15,2,6] {+} big_f(A,g(B,A))|big_f(B,g(B,A))|big_f(g(B,A),g(B,A)).
% 0.20/0.53 19 [factor,18.1.2] {+} big_f(A,g(A,A))|big_f(g(A,A),g(A,A)).
% 0.20/0.53 25 [hyper,19,1,6,factor_simp] {+} big_f(g(A,A),g(A,A))|big_g(A,g(A,A)).
% 0.20/0.53 31 [hyper,25,5,15] {+} big_f(g(A,A),g(A,A))|big_f(g(A,g(A,A)),g(A,g(A,A))).
% 0.20/0.53 44 [hyper,31,3,19,factor_simp] {+} big_f(g(A,A),g(A,A))|big_g(g(A,g(A,A)),g(A,g(A,A))).
% 0.20/0.53 63 [hyper,44,5,25,factor_simp] {-} big_f(g(A,A),g(A,A)).
% 0.20/0.53 66 [hyper,63,3,63] {-} big_g(g(g(A,A),g(A,A)),g(g(A,A),g(A,A))).
% 0.20/0.53 77 [hyper,66,5,66] {-} $F.
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.20/0.53 ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 ============ end of search ============
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.54 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 true clauses given 3 (20.0%)
% 0.20/0.54 false clauses given 12
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 FALSE TRUE
% 0.20/0.54 14 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 17 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 18 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 21 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 23 1 1
% 0.20/0.54 26 1 0
% 0.20/0.54 27 0 2
% 0.20/0.54 29 1 1
% 0.20/0.54 33 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 34 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 37 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 41 1 0
% 0.20/0.54 47 1 0
% 0.20/0.54 50 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 53 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 54 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 57 0 1
% 0.20/0.54 tot: 5 15 (75.0% true)
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 Model 7 [ 6 -1 204 ] (0.00 seconds, 7271 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 Process 3409 finished Tue Jul 12 01:13:28 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------