TSTP Solution File: SYN012-1 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN012-1 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.1.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art09.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:22:29 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP31076/SYN/SYN012-1+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ....... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 57] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 255] [nf = 7] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1310] [nf = 43] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 6215] [nf = 293] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 31314] [nf = 1811] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 150105] [nf = 8857] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 751570] [nf = 53913] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 3652205] [nf = 240901] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 13011899] [nf = 982948] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 13011950] [nf = 982948] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 13012154] [nf = 982957] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 13013302] [nf = 983011] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 31 secs [nr = 13019286] [nf = 983395] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13055268] [nf = 986020] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 13273171] [nf = 1004258] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 14755647] [nf = 1145531] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 61 secs [nr = 25064066] [nf = 2173008] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 254 secs [nr = 100194916] [nf = 10736733] [nu = 0] [ut = 0]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 131171163
% resolvents: 118337399 factors: 12833764
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% Total = 0
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 11104594 [3] = 35549944 [4] = 44004075 [5] = 40512550
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] big_f_2 (+)0 (-)0
% [1] big_g_2 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)0 (-)0
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 0
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 141816181
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 30263380
% Number of successful unifications: 131171163
% Number of unification failures: 98027320
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 152502878
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 144918134
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 21
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 0
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: nan
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 37
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 229198483
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 437237
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------