TSTP Solution File: SYN009-4 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : SYN009-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May 21 07:41:46 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 23 ( 7 unt; 6 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 62 ( 0 equ; 43 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
~ n(c,c,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_9,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1,X2,X3)
| n(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_9) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ n(c,c,c),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1,X2,X3)
| n(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[clause_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X1,X2,X3)
| r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ m(X1,X2,X3) ),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ n(c,c,c),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
( m(X1,X2,X3)
| n(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
clause_6 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3)
| ~ m(X3,X2,X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
m(c,c,c),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN009-4 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.13/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon May 20 15:52:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.20/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 30419 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 30424 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 319
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 21
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1592 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.002 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.20/0.49 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------