TSTP Solution File: SYN009-2 by Otter---3.3

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Otter---3.3
% Problem  : SYN009-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : otter-tptp-script %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Jul 27 13:23:18 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.87s 2.07s
% Output   : Refutation 1.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   4 unt;   5 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   30 (   0 equ;  12 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    6 (   5 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(1,axiom,
    ( ~ p(A,B,C)
    | ~ t(A,B,C) ),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(2,axiom,
    ( ~ q(A,B,C)
    | ~ t(B,C,A) ),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(3,axiom,
    ( ~ r(A,B,C)
    | ~ t(C,A,B) ),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(4,axiom,
    ( ~ s(A)
    | ~ s(B)
    | ~ s(C)
    | p(A,B,C)
    | q(B,C,A)
    | r(C,A,B) ),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(5,plain,
    ( ~ s(A)
    | ~ s(B)
    | p(A,A,B)
    | q(A,B,A)
    | r(B,A,A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[4]),
    [iquote('factor,4.1.2')] ).

cnf(8,plain,
    ( ~ s(A)
    | p(A,A,A)
    | q(A,A,A)
    | r(A,A,A) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[5]),
    [iquote('factor,5.1.2')] ).

cnf(11,axiom,
    s(c),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    t(c,c,c),
    file('SYN009-2.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(21,plain,
    ( p(c,c,c)
    | q(c,c,c)
    | r(c,c,c) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[11,8]),
    [iquote('hyper,11,8')] ).

cnf(40,plain,
    ( p(c,c,c)
    | q(c,c,c) ),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[21,3,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,21,3,12')] ).

cnf(41,plain,
    p(c,c,c),
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[40,2,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,40,2,12')] ).

cnf(42,plain,
    $false,
    inference(hyper,[status(thm)],[41,1,12]),
    [iquote('hyper,41,1,12')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SYN009-2 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : otter-tptp-script %s
% 0.11/0.32  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.33  % DateTime : Wed Jul 27 11:13:16 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.87/2.07  ----- Otter 3.3f, August 2004 -----
% 1.87/2.07  The process was started by sandbox on n006.cluster.edu,
% 1.87/2.07  Wed Jul 27 11:13:16 2022
% 1.87/2.07  The command was "./otter".  The process ID is 15599.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 1.87/2.07  set(auto).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(auto1).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(process_input).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: assign(max_seconds, 10800).
% 1.87/2.07  clear(print_given).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  list(usable).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -p(X,Y,Z)| -t(X,Y,Z).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -q(X,Y,Z)| -t(Y,Z,X).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -r(X,Y,Z)| -t(Z,X,Y).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] s(a).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] s(b).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] s(c).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] t(c,c,c).
% 1.87/2.07  0 [] -s(X)| -s(Y)| -s(Z)|p(X,Y,Z)|q(Y,Z,X)|r(Z,X,Y).
% 1.87/2.07  end_of_list.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=0, symmetry=0, max_lits=6.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  This is a non-Horn set without equality.  The strategy will
% 1.87/2.07  be ordered hyper_res, unit deletion, and factoring, with
% 1.87/2.07  satellites in sos and with nuclei in usable.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(factor).
% 1.87/2.07     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ------------> process usable:
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 1 [] -p(A,B,C)| -t(A,B,C).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 2 [] -q(A,B,C)| -t(B,C,A).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=8): 3 [] -r(A,B,C)| -t(C,A,B).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=18): 4 [] -s(A)| -s(B)| -s(C)|p(A,B,C)|q(B,C,A)|r(C,A,B).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ------------> process sos:
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 9 [] s(a).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 10 [] s(b).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=2): 11 [] s(c).
% 1.87/2.07  ** KEPT (pick-wt=4): 12 [] t(c,c,c).
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  =========== start of search ===========
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  -----> EMPTY CLAUSE at   0.00 sec ----> 42 [hyper,41,1,12] $F.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 1.87/2.07  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.87/2.07  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.87/2.07  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ============ end of search ============
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  -------------- statistics -------------
% 1.87/2.07  clauses given                 15
% 1.87/2.07  clauses generated             90
% 1.87/2.07  clauses kept                  41
% 1.87/2.07  clauses forward subsumed      56
% 1.87/2.07  clauses back subsumed          2
% 1.87/2.07  Kbytes malloced              976
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  ----------- times (seconds) -----------
% 1.87/2.07  user CPU time          0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  system CPU time        0.00          (0 hr, 0 min, 0 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  wall-clock time        2             (0 hr, 0 min, 2 sec)
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 1.87/2.07  
% 1.87/2.07  Process 15599 finished Wed Jul 27 11:13:18 2022
% 1.87/2.07  Otter interrupted
% 1.87/2.07  PROOF FOUND
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------