TSTP Solution File: SYN009-2 by E-SAT---3.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem : SYN009-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:28:10 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.23s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 16 ( 5 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 47 ( 0 equ; 33 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 5 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 1 ( 1 usr; 1 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X3,X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_3) ).
cnf(clause_8,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X2,X3,X1)
| r(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_8) ).
cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X2,X3,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_2) ).
cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X1,X2,X3) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_1) ).
cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
t(c,c,c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_7) ).
cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p',clause_6) ).
cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
( ~ r(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X3,X1,X2) ),
clause_3 ).
cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| q(X2,X3,X1)
| r(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3) ),
clause_8 ).
cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
( ~ q(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X2,X3,X1) ),
clause_2 ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
( q(X1,X2,X3)
| p(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X3)
| ~ t(X1,X2,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
( ~ p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ t(X1,X2,X3) ),
clause_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
( p(X1,X2,X3)
| ~ s(X3)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X1)
| ~ t(X3,X1,X2)
| ~ t(X2,X3,X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
( ~ s(X1)
| ~ s(X2)
| ~ s(X3)
| ~ t(X3,X2,X1)
| ~ t(X1,X3,X2)
| ~ t(X2,X1,X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
t(c,c,c),
clause_7 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
s(c),
clause_6 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_13])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.14/0.14 % Problem : SYN009-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 2400
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Mon Oct 2 18:17:35 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.3Co5SmVTvq/E---3.1_21047.p
% 0.23/0.49 # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 21191 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 21195 completed with status 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.23/0.49 # Search class: FGHNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.23/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.23/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.23/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.23/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.23/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 8
% 0.23/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Initial clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 8
% 0.23/0.49 # Processed clauses : 19
% 0.23/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 19
% 0.23/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Generated clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3
% 0.23/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Paramodulations : 4
% 0.23/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 2
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 11
% 0.23/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.23/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 7
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 8
% 0.23/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3
% 0.23/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.23/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.23/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 268
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 # User time : 0.000 s
% 0.23/0.49 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Total time : 0.004 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1636 pages
% 0.23/0.49
% 0.23/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/0.49 # User time : 0.000 s
% 0.23/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Total time : 0.007 s
% 0.23/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1676 pages
% 0.23/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------