TSTP Solution File: SYN009-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7QHnuYWtu true
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 04:01:06 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.72s
% Output : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.14/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.y7QHnuYWtu true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:17:50 EDT 2023
% 0.21/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.34 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.21/0.34 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.21/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.56/0.64 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.56/0.64 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.56/0.64 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.56/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.71 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.72 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.72 % BCE start: 7
% 0.56/0.72 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.56/0.72 % PE start: 7
% 0.56/0.72 logic: neq
% 0.56/0.72 % PE eliminated: 3
% 0.56/0.72 % done 3 iterations in 0.006s
% 0.56/0.72 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.72 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.72 thf(p_type, type, p: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(r_type, type, r: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(q_type, type, q: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(c_type, type, c: $i).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(s_type, type, s: $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(clause_7, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.72 (~( ( r @ X @ Y @ Z ) | ( q @ X @ Y @ Z ) | ( p @ X @ Y @ Z ) |
% 0.56/0.72 ( ~( s @ Z ) ) | ( ~( s @ Y ) ) | ( ~( s @ X ) ) ))).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.56/0.72 (( r @ X @ Y @ Z ) | ( q @ X @ Y @ Z ) | ( p @ X @ Y @ Z ) |
% 0.56/0.72 ( ~( s @ Z ) ) | ( ~( s @ Y ) ) | ( ~( s @ X ) )),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_7])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain,
% 0.56/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.72 ( (r @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.56/0.72 | (q @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.56/0.72 | (p @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.56/0.72 | ~ (s @ X2)
% 0.56/0.72 | ~ (s @ X1)
% 0.56/0.72 | ~ (s @ X0))),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(clause_1, conjecture, (p @ c @ X @ Y)).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (~( p @ c @ X @ Y )),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_1])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (p @ c @ X0 @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl7, plain,
% 0.56/0.72 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.72 (~ (s @ c)
% 0.56/0.72 | ~ (s @ X0)
% 0.56/0.72 | ~ (s @ X1)
% 0.56/0.72 | (q @ c @ X0 @ X1)
% 0.56/0.72 | (r @ c @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.72 [zip_derived_cl6, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(clause_2, conjecture, (q @ X @ c @ Y)).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_2, negated_conjecture, (~( q @ X @ c @ Y )),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_2])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (q @ X0 @ c @ X1)),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_2])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl8, plain,
% 0.56/0.72 (![X0 : $i]: ( (r @ c @ c @ X0) | ~ (s @ X0) | ~ (s @ c) | ~ (s @ c))),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.72 [zip_derived_cl7, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(clause_3, conjecture, (r @ X @ Y @ c)).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_3, negated_conjecture, (~( r @ X @ Y @ c )),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_3])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain, (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ~ (r @ X0 @ X1 @ c)),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_3])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, ((~ (s @ c) | ~ (s @ c) | ~ (s @ c))),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('dp-resolution', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.72 [zip_derived_cl8, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (s @ c)),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('simplify', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(clause_6, conjecture, (~( s @ c ))).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zf_stmt_4, negated_conjecture, (s @ c),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [clause_6])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, ( (s @ c)),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_4])).
% 0.56/0.72 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.72 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl10, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.56/0.72
% 0.56/0.72 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.72
% 0.56/0.72
% 0.56/0.72 % Terminating...
% 0.56/0.75 % Runner terminated.
% 0.56/0.76 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------