TSTP Solution File: SYN009-1 by Etableau---0.67
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Etableau---0.67
% Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 06:07:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Jul 12 02:32:21 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.36 # Auto-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.36 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 0.18/0.36 #
% 0.18/0.36 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.36 # Number of axioms: 7 Number of unprocessed: 7
% 0.18/0.36 # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.18/0.36 # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.18/0.36 # Hello from C++
% 0.18/0.36 # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.18/0.36 # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.18/0.36 # 7 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.18/0.36 # Creating start rules for all 7 conjectures.
% 0.18/0.36 # There are 7 start rule candidates:
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.18/0.36 # Closed tableau found in foldup close cycle with 0 folds and 6 closures done.
% 0.18/0.36 # Found closed tableau while making start rule
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # There were 0 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # End clausification derivation
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_13, negated_conjecture, (s(c))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_11, negated_conjecture, (s(a))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (s(b))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_10, negated_conjecture, (~r(X1,X2,c))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_9, negated_conjecture, (~q(X1,c,X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_8, negated_conjecture, (~p(c,X1,X2))).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (r(X1,X2,X3)|q(X1,X2,X3)|p(X1,X2,X3)|~s(X3)|~s(X2)|~s(X1))).
% 0.18/0.36 # End listing active clauses. There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.18/0.36 # Begin printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # Found 7 steps
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_14, negated_conjecture, (r(c,c,c)|q(c,c,c)|p(c,c,c)|~s(c)|~s(c)|~s(c)), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_15, plain, (r(c,c,c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_10])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_16, plain, (q(c,c,c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_9])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_17, plain, (p(c,c,c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_8])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_18, plain, (~s(c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_19, plain, (~s(c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.18/0.36 cnf(i_0_20, plain, (~s(c)), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_13])).
% 0.18/0.36 # End printing tableau
% 0.18/0.36 # SZS output end
% 0.18/0.36 # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.18/0.36 # NOT attempting initial tableau saturation
% 0.18/0.36 # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.18/0.36 # 1 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.18/0.36 # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.18/0.36
% 0.18/0.36 # Proof search is over...
% 0.18/0.36 # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------