TSTP Solution File: SYN009-1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:28:10 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   13 (   9 unt;   3 nHn;  13 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   27 (   0 equ;  15 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   4 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    1 (   1 usr;   1 con; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   21 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r(X1,X2,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p',clause_3) ).

cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2,X3)
    | q(X1,X2,X3)
    | r(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ s(X1)
    | ~ s(X2)
    | ~ s(X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p',clause_7) ).

cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
    s(c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p',clause_6) ).

cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q(X1,c,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p',clause_2) ).

cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(c,X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p',clause_1) ).

cnf(c_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r(X1,X2,c),
    clause_3 ).

cnf(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,X2,X3)
    | q(X1,X2,X3)
    | r(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ s(X1)
    | ~ s(X2)
    | ~ s(X3) ),
    clause_7 ).

cnf(c_0_7,negated_conjecture,
    s(c),
    clause_6 ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ q(X1,c,X2),
    clause_2 ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( q(X1,X2,c)
    | p(X1,X2,c)
    | ~ s(X2)
    | ~ s(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ p(c,X1,X2),
    clause_1 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( p(X1,c,c)
    | ~ s(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_7])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]),c_0_7])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.09  % Problem    : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.05/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 18:51:51 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.31  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.42  Running first-order model finding
% 0.15/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.H4LC0BOb0G/E---3.1_8942.p
% 0.15/0.43  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # new_bool_3 with pid 9020 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 9024 completed with status 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.15/0.43  # Search class: FGUNF-FFSS00-SFFFFFNN
% 0.15/0.43  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.15/0.43  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.15/0.43  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # Proof found!
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/0.43  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/0.43  # Parsed axioms                        : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses                      : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Processed clauses                    : 16
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...remaining for further processing  : 16
% 0.15/0.43  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Generated clauses                    : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2
% 0.15/0.43  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Paramodulations                      : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Total rewrite steps                  : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of processed clauses  : 9
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 3
% 0.15/0.43  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.15/0.43  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 3
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.15/0.43  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Current number of archived clauses   : 7
% 0.15/0.43  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1
% 0.15/0.43  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.15/0.43  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.15/0.43  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 169
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.003 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1648 pages
% 0.15/0.43  
% 0.15/0.43  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/0.43  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.15/0.43  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Total time               : 0.005 s
% 0.15/0.43  # Maximum resident set size: 1672 pages
% 0.15/0.43  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------