TSTP Solution File: SYN009-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:41 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.60s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.15/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 20:23:28 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.55 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.59 % Transform :cnf
% 0.19/0.59 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.19/0.59 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.19/0.59 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.59 % File : SYN009-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.19/0.59 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.19/0.59 % Problem : A problem to demonstrate the usefulness of relevancy testing
% 0.19/0.59 % Version : Biased.
% 0.19/0.59 % English :
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 % Refs : [WL89] Wilson & Loveland (1989), Incorporating Relevancy Test
% 0.19/0.59 % Source : [WL89]
% 0.19/0.59 % Names : Figure 8 [WL89]
% 0.19/0.59
% 0.19/0.59 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.59 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.19/0.59 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 7 ( 6 unt; 1 nHn; 7 RR)
% 0.19/0.59 % Number of literals : 12 ( 0 equ; 6 neg)
% 0.19/0.59 % Maximal clause size : 6 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.59 % Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of predicates : 4 ( 4 usr; 0 prp; 1-3 aty)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% 0.19/0.60 % Number of variables : 9 ( 6 sgn)
% 0.19/0.60 % SPC : CNF_UNS_EPR_NEQ_NHN
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 % Comments :
% 0.19/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 ~ p(c,X,Y) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 ~ q(X,c,Y) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 ~ r(X,Y,c) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 s(a) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 s(b) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 s(c) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(clause_7,negated_conjecture,
% 0.19/0.60 ( ~ s(X)
% 0.19/0.60 | ~ s(Y)
% 0.19/0.60 | ~ s(Z)
% 0.19/0.60 | p(X,Y,Z)
% 0.19/0.60 | q(X,Y,Z)
% 0.19/0.60 | r(X,Y,Z) ) ).
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 % Proof found
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.60 %ClaNum:7(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.19/0.60 %VarNum:18(SingletonVarNum:9)
% 0.19/0.60 %MaxLitNum:6
% 0.19/0.60 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.19/0.60 %SharedTerms:6
% 0.19/0.60 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
% 0.19/0.60 %singleGoalClaCount:6
% 0.19/0.60 [1]P1(a1)
% 0.19/0.60 [2]P1(a2)
% 0.19/0.60 [3]P1(a3)
% 0.19/0.60 [4]~P2(x41,x42,a1)
% 0.19/0.60 [5]~P3(x51,a1,x52)
% 0.19/0.60 [6]~P4(a1,x61,x62)
% 0.19/0.60 [7]P3(x71,x72,x73)+P2(x71,x72,x73)+~P1(x73)+~P1(x72)+~P1(x71)+P4(x71,x72,x73)
% 0.19/0.60 %EqnAxiom
% 0.19/0.60
% 0.19/0.60 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.19/0.60 cnf(8,plain,
% 0.19/0.60 ($false),
% 0.19/0.60 inference(scs_inference,[],[5,4,1,6,7]),
% 0.19/0.60 ['proof']).
% 0.19/0.60 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.60 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------