TSTP Solution File: SYN008-1 by CSE---1.6
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CSE---1.6
% Problem : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:40 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.61s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sat Aug 26 21:15:12 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.56 start to proof:theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % File :CSE---1.6
% 0.21/0.61 % Problem :theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 % Transform :cnf
% 0.21/0.61 % Format :tptp:raw
% 0.21/0.61 % Command :java -jar mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Result :Theorem 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.61 % Output :CNFRefutation 0.000000s
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % File : SYN008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.21/0.61 % Domain : Syntactic
% 0.21/0.61 % Problem : A problem to demonstrate the usefulness of relevancy testing
% 0.21/0.61 % Version : Biased.
% 0.21/0.61 % English :
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Refs : [WL89] Wilson & Loveland (1989), Incorporating Relevancy Test
% 0.21/0.61 % Source : [WL89]
% 0.21/0.61 % Names : Figure 3 [WL89]
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Status : Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.61 % Rating : 0.00 v2.0.0
% 0.21/0.61 % Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 3 unt; 3 nHn; 6 RR)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of literals : 13 ( 0 equ; 5 neg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal clause size : 4 ( 2 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of predicates : 7 ( 7 usr; 7 prp; 0-0 aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% 0.21/0.61 % Number of variables : 0 ( 0 sgn)
% 0.21/0.61 % SPC : CNF_UNS_PRP
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 % Comments :
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_1,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ~ p ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_2,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ~ q ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_3,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 r ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_4,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ r
% 0.21/0.61 | a
% 0.21/0.61 | b ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_5,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ r
% 0.21/0.61 | p
% 0.21/0.61 | c
% 0.21/0.61 | d ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 cnf(clause_6,negated_conjecture,
% 0.21/0.61 ( ~ r
% 0.21/0.61 | p
% 0.21/0.61 | q ) ).
% 0.21/0.61
% 0.21/0.61 %--------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.61 % Proof found
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.21/0.61 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.21/0.62 %ClaNum:6(EqnAxiom:0)
% 0.21/0.62 %VarNum:0(SingletonVarNum:0)
% 0.21/0.62 %MaxLitNum:4
% 0.21/0.62 %MaxfuncDepth:0
% 0.21/0.62 %SharedTerms:11
% 0.21/0.62 %goalClause: 1 2 3 4 5 6
% 0.21/0.62 %singleGoalClaCount:3
% 0.21/0.62 [1]P1(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 [2]~P2(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 [3]~P7(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 [4]P2(a500)+P7(a500)+~P1(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 [5]P3(a500)+P4(a500)+~P1(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 [6]P2(a500)+P5(a500)+P6(a500)+~P1(a500)
% 0.21/0.62 %EqnAxiom
% 0.21/0.62
% 0.21/0.62 %-------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.62 cnf(7,plain,
% 0.21/0.62 ($false),
% 0.21/0.62 inference(scs_inference,[],[2,3,1,4]),
% 0.21/0.62 ['proof']).
% 0.21/0.62 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.21/0.62 % Total time :0.000000s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------