TSTP Solution File: SYN003-1.006 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : SYN003-1.006 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art03.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Nov 28 08:21:42 EST 2010
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s
% Output : Refutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ERROR: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP25523/SYN/SYN003-1.006+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ........................ done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 19] [nf = 0] [nu = 15] [ut = 14]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 74] [nf = 0] [nu = 34] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% +================================================+
% | |
% | Congratulations!!! ........ A proof was found. |
% | |
% +================================================+
% Base Clauses and Unit Clauses used in proof:
% ============================================
% Base Clauses:
% -------------
% B0: p_1
% B1: ~p_6
% B2: q
% B3: ~q | q_1
% B4: ~q | q_2
% B5: ~q | q_3
% B6: ~q | q_4
% B7: ~q | q_5
% B13: ~p_1 | ~q_1 | p_2
% B15: ~p_2 | ~q_2 | p_3
% B17: ~p_3 | ~q_3 | p_4
% B19: ~p_4 | ~q_4 | p_5
% B21: ~p_5 | ~q_5 | p_6
% Unit Clauses:
% --------------
% U2: < d0 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 b nc > q
% U4: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > q_1
% U8: < d1 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > q_5
% U14: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > p_2
% U15: < d2 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > ~p_5
% U16: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > p_3
% U17: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > p_4
% U18: < d3 v0 dv0 f0 c0 t0 td0 > p_5
% --------------- Start of Proof ---------------
% Derivation of unit clause U2:
% q ....... U2
% Derivation of unit clause U4:
% q ....... B2
% ~q | q_1 ....... B3
% q_1 ....... R1 [B2:L0, B3:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U8:
% q ....... B2
% ~q | q_5 ....... B7
% q_5 ....... R1 [B2:L0, B7:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U14:
% p_1 ....... B0
% ~p_1 | ~q_1 | p_2 ....... B13
% ~q_1 | p_2 ....... R1 [B0:L0, B13:L0]
% q_1 ....... U4
% p_2 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U4:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U15:
% ~p_6 ....... B1
% ~p_5 | ~q_5 | p_6 ....... B21
% ~p_5 | ~q_5 ....... R1 [B1:L0, B21:L2]
% q_5 ....... U8
% ~p_5 ....... R2 [R1:L1, U8:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U16:
% ~q | q_2 ....... B4
% ~p_2 | ~q_2 | p_3 ....... B15
% ~q | ~p_2 | p_3 ....... R1 [B4:L1, B15:L1]
% q ....... U2
% ~p_2 | p_3 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0]
% p_2 ....... U14
% p_3 ....... R3 [R2:L0, U14:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U17:
% ~q | q_3 ....... B5
% ~p_3 | ~q_3 | p_4 ....... B17
% ~q | ~p_3 | p_4 ....... R1 [B5:L1, B17:L1]
% q ....... U2
% ~p_3 | p_4 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0]
% p_3 ....... U16
% p_4 ....... R3 [R2:L0, U16:L0]
% Derivation of unit clause U18:
% ~q | q_4 ....... B6
% ~p_4 | ~q_4 | p_5 ....... B19
% ~q | ~p_4 | p_5 ....... R1 [B6:L1, B19:L1]
% q ....... U2
% ~p_4 | p_5 ....... R2 [R1:L0, U2:L0]
% p_4 ....... U17
% p_5 ....... R3 [R2:L0, U17:L0]
% Derivation of the empty clause:
% p_5 ....... U18
% ~p_5 ....... U15
% [] ....... R1 [U18:L0, U15:L0]
% --------------- End of Proof ---------------
% PROOF FOUND!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 125
% resolvents: 125 factors: 0
% Number of unit clauses generated: 58
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 46.40
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 4 [1] = 10 [2] = 2 [3] = 3
% Total = 19
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 58 [2] = 45 [3] = 22
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] p_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [1] p_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [2] p_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [3] p_4 (+)1 (-)0
% [4] p_5 (+)1 (-)1
% [5] p_6 (+)0 (-)1
% [6] q (+)1 (-)0
% [7] q_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [8] q_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [9] q_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [10] q_4 (+)1 (-)0
% [11] q_5 (+)1 (-)0
% [12] r (+)1 (-)0
% [13] r_1 (+)1 (-)0
% [14] r_2 (+)1 (-)0
% [15] r_3 (+)1 (-)0
% [16] r_4 (+)1 (-)0
% [17] r_5 (+)1 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)17 (-)2
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 19
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 258
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 140
% Number of unification failures: 0
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 209
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 741
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 15
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 0
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 0
% Number of states in UCFA table: 3
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 0
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: inf
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 52
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 140
% ConstructUnitClause() = 30
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: inf
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 0 secs
% CPU time: 0.15 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------