%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SYN001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.20s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    1
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    9 (   3 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   17 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   14 (   6   ~;   4   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   1 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-0 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8,f7]) ).

fof(f7,plain,
    p,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f5,plain,
    ( p
    | p ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f4,plain,
    ( ( ~ p
      | ~ p )
    & ( p
      | p ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).

fof(f3,plain,
    ( p
  <~> p ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( p
    <=> p ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f1,conjecture,
    ( p
  <=> p ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel2) ).

fof(f8,plain,
    ~ p,
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f6,plain,
    ( ~ p
    | ~ p ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem    : SYN001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:16:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  % (10520)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/467Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (3000ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.49  
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Memory used [KB]: 5373
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Time elapsed: 0.091 s
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10504)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49  % (10496)Success in time 0.135 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------