TSTP Solution File: SYN001+1 by SnakeForV---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV---1.0
% Problem : SYN001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:25:10 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.20s 0.54s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 1
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 9 ( 3 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 17 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 14 ( 6 ~; 4 |; 1 &)
% ( 2 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 1 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 0 ( 0 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 2 prp; 0-0 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 0 ( 0 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f8,f7]) ).
fof(f7,plain,
p,
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f5]) ).
fof(f5,plain,
( p
| p ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f4,plain,
( ( ~ p
| ~ p )
& ( p
| p ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
fof(f3,plain,
( p
<~> p ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
fof(f2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( p
<=> p ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f1]) ).
fof(f1,conjecture,
( p
<=> p ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',pel2) ).
fof(f8,plain,
~ p,
inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f6,plain,
( ~ p
| ~ p ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SYN001+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_uns --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Tue Aug 30 21:43:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 % (18864)lrs+10_5:1_br=off:fde=none:nwc=3.0:sd=1:sgt=10:sos=on:ss=axioms:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18866)dis+21_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=frequency:ss=included:to=lpo:i=15:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/15Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18861)dis+1002_1:12_drc=off:fd=preordered:tgt=full:i=99978:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99978Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (18861)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.53 % (18867)dis+1010_1:50_awrs=decay:awrsf=128:nwc=10.0:s2pl=no:sp=frequency:ss=axioms:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18890)lrs-11_1:1_nm=0:sac=on:sd=4:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=24:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/24Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18862)lrs+10_1:1_gsp=on:sd=1:sgt=32:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18881)dis+1010_1:1_bs=on:ep=RS:erd=off:newcnf=on:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:sgt=32:ss=axioms:i=30:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/30Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18871)lrs+10_1:1_ep=R:lcm=predicate:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal:ss=included:i=12:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/12Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18865)lrs+10_1:1024_nm=0:nwc=5.0:ss=axioms:i=13:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/13Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18871)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.20/0.53 % (18874)lrs+10_1:32_br=off:nm=16:sd=2:ss=axioms:st=2.0:urr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18884)dis+10_1:1_av=off:sos=on:sp=reverse_arity:ss=included:st=2.0:to=lpo:urr=ec_only:i=45:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/45Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18880)dis-10_3:2_amm=sco:ep=RS:fsr=off:nm=10:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:st=3.0:i=11:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/11Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18882)ott+21_1:1_erd=off:s2a=on:sac=on:sd=1:sgt=64:sos=on:ss=included:st=3.0:to=lpo:urr=on:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18883)dis+1010_2:3_fs=off:fsr=off:nm=0:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2agt=32:i=82:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/82Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (18885)dis+21_1:1_ep=RS:nwc=10.0:s2a=on:s2at=1.5:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18886)lrs+11_1:1_plsq=on:plsqc=1:plsqr=32,1:ss=included:i=95:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/95Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18873)lrs+10_1:4_av=off:bs=unit_only:bsr=unit_only:ep=RS:s2a=on:sos=on:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=16:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/16Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18875)lrs+10_1:1_ins=3:sp=reverse_frequency:spb=goal:to=lpo:i=3:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/3Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18868)lrs+2_1:1_lcm=reverse:lma=on:sos=all:spb=goal_then_units:ss=included:urr=on:i=39:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/39Mi)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.54 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.54
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Memory used [KB]: 5884
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)Time elapsed: 0.118 s
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (18861)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.54 % (18860)Success in time 0.191 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------