TSTP Solution File: SYN000_1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SYN000_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:36:30 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.49s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   11 (   7 unt;   4 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    7 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    4 (   2   >;   2   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    4 (   2   !;   2   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    new: $tType ).

tff(func_def_8,type,
    newc: new ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    newf: ( new * $i ) > new ).

tff(pred_def_11,type,
    newp: ( new * $i ) > $o ).

fof(f64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolution,[],[f59,f60]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f27]) ).

fof(f27,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ p(X0),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

fof(f11,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ? [X0] : p(X0),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f10]) ).

fof(f10,conjecture,
    ? [X0] : p(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_conjecture) ).

fof(f59,plain,
    p(h),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

fof(f9,axiom,
    p(h),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',role_hypothesis) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem    : SYN000_1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v5.0.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.33  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:38:31 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.49  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.49  
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Time elapsed: 0.096 s
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (30376)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.49  % (30360)Success in time 0.148 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------