TSTP Solution File: SWW970+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:19:35 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 12.93s 13.11s
% Output : Refutation 12.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12 % Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 11:02:48 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 12.93/13.11 # Version: 1.3
% 12.93/13.11 # SZS status Theorem
% 12.93/13.11 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 12.93/13.11 fof(co0,conjecture,pred_attacker(name_objective),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c32,negated_conjecture,(~pred_attacker(name_objective)),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[co0])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c33,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c32])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c34,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c33])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(ax93,axiom,(![VAR_V_112]:(pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(VAR_V_112))=>pred_attacker(VAR_V_112))),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c167,axiom,(![VAR_V_112]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(VAR_V_112))|pred_attacker(VAR_V_112))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax93])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c168,axiom,(![X79]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X79))|pred_attacker(X79))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c167])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c169,axiom,~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(X288))|pred_attacker(X288),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c168])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(ax134,axiom,(![VAR_V_280X30]:pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(VAR_V_280X30))),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c50,axiom,(![X5]:pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X5))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[ax134])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c51,axiom,pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X159)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c50])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(ax94,axiom,(![VAR_V_115]:(pred_attacker(VAR_V_115)=>pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_V_115)))),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c164,axiom,(![VAR_V_115]:(~pred_attacker(VAR_V_115)|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_V_115)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax94])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c165,axiom,(![X78]:(~pred_attacker(X78)|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X78)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c164])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c166,axiom,~pred_attacker(X274)|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X274)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c165])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c905,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(name_new0x2Dname(X286))),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c166, c51])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(ax79,axiom,(![VAR_X_67]:(![VAR_Y_68]:pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(VAR_X_67,VAR_Y_68))),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c207,axiom,(![X94]:(![X95]:pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X94,X95))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[ax79])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c208,axiom,pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X153,X152),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c207])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(ax135,axiom,(![VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30]:((pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30,name_Kbs)))&pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30)))=>pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)))),input).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c45,axiom,(![VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30]:((~pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30,name_Kbs)))|~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30)))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax135])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c46,axiom,((![VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30]:(~pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30,name_Kbs)))|~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(VAR_ENC_A_KAB_T_330X30))))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c45])).
% 12.93/13.11 fof(c48,axiom,(![X4]:((~pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X4,name_Kbs)))|~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X4)))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c47,axiom,((![X4]:(~pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X4,name_Kbs)))|~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X4))))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c46])).])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c49,axiom,~pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_3_get_0x30(constr_cbc_dec_3(X285,name_Kbs)))|~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X285))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c48])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c1009,plain,~pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_1(X548))|pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c49, c208])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c20605,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_2(name_objective)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c1009, c905])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c20713,plain,pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c20605, c169])).
% 12.93/13.11 cnf(c20729,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c20713, c34])).
% 12.93/13.11 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 12.93/13.11
% 12.93/13.11 # Initial clauses : 174
% 12.93/13.11 # Processed clauses : 929
% 12.93/13.11 # Factors computed : 0
% 12.93/13.11 # Resolvents computed: 20453
% 12.93/13.11 # Tautologies deleted: 2
% 12.93/13.11 # Forward subsumed : 152
% 12.93/13.11 # Backward subsumed : 2
% 12.93/13.11 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 12.93/13.11 # User time : 12.717 s
% 12.93/13.11 # System time : 0.045 s
% 12.93/13.11 # Total time : 12.762 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------