TSTP Solution File: SWW970+1 by Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III-SAT---1.7.15
% Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:26:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 64.62s 10.52s
% Output : Refutation 64.62s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 54 ( 3 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 125 ( 12 ~; 10 |; 3 &; 93 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 7 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 8 ( 5 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 13 ( 10 usr; 6 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 21 ( 0 ^ 20 !; 1 ?; 21 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(pred_attacker_type,type,
pred_attacker: $i > $o ).
thf(name_objective_type,type,
name_objective: $i ).
thf(name_A_type,type,
name_A: $i ).
thf(constr_CONST_3_type,type,
constr_CONST_3: $i ).
thf(name_Kbs_type,type,
name_Kbs: $i ).
thf(pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring_type,type,
pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring: $i > $i > $o ).
thf(constr_cbc_dec_3_type,type,
constr_cbc_dec_3: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(constr_tuple_3_get_0x30_type,type,
constr_tuple_3_get_0x30: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_client_B_out_2_type,type,
tuple_client_B_out_2: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_client_B_in_1_type,type,
tuple_client_B_in_1: $i > $i ).
thf(72,axiom,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax111) ).
thf(347,plain,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_3,
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[72]) ).
thf(92,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ A )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax94) ).
thf(392,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ A )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[92]) ).
thf(393,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ A )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[392]) ).
thf(7228,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) )
| ( ( pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_3 )
!= ( pred_attacker @ A ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[347,393]) ).
thf(7229,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ constr_CONST_3 ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[7228:[bind(A,$thf( constr_CONST_3 ))]]) ).
thf(81,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ name_A @ ( constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 @ ( constr_cbc_dec_3 @ A @ name_Kbs ) ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax135) ).
thf(363,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ name_A @ ( constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 @ ( constr_cbc_dec_3 @ A @ name_Kbs ) ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[81]) ).
thf(364,plain,
( ? [A: $i] :
( ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ name_A @ ( constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 @ ( constr_cbc_dec_3 @ A @ name_Kbs ) ) )
& ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(miniscope,[status(thm)],[363]) ).
thf(365,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ name_A @ ( constr_tuple_3_get_0x30 @ ( constr_cbc_dec_3 @ A @ name_Kbs ) ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[364]) ).
thf(37,axiom,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ A @ B ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax79) ).
thf(243,plain,
! [A: $i,B: $i] : ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ A @ B ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[37]) ).
thf(244,plain,
! [B: $i,A: $i] : ( pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring @ A @ B ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[243]) ).
thf(2421,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ $true
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[365,244]) ).
thf(2422,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[2421]) ).
thf(7731,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) )
| ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ constr_CONST_3 ) )
!= ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_in_1 @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7229,2422]) ).
thf(7732,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[7731:[bind(A,$thf( constr_CONST_3 ))]]) ).
thf(110,axiom,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ A ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ A ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax93) ).
thf(431,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ A ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ A ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[110]) ).
thf(432,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ A ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ A ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[431]) ).
thf(17401,plain,
! [A: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ A )
| ( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ name_objective ) )
!= ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_client_B_out_2 @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[7732,432]) ).
thf(17402,plain,
pred_attacker @ name_objective,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[17401:[bind(A,$thf( name_objective ))]]) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
pred_attacker @ name_objective,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(140,plain,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(17533,plain,
$false,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[17402,140]) ).
thf(17534,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[17533]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12 % Problem : SWW970+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12 % Command : run_Leo-III %s %d SAT
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 07:06:25 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.87/0.85 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.18/0.99 % [INFO] Parsing done (133ms).
% 1.18/0.99 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 1.82/1.19 % [INFO] nitpick registered as external prover.
% 1.82/1.19 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 1.96/1.25 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 138 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 1.96/1.31 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 137 axioms (removed 1 axioms).
% 2.43/1.38 % [INFO] Problem is first-order (TPTP FOF).
% 2.43/1.40 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.43/1.40 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 64.62/10.51 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 64.62/10.51 % Time passed: 9984ms (effective reasoning time: 9515ms)
% 64.62/10.51 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 64.62/10.52 % Axioms used in derivation (5): ax94, ax135, ax93, ax111, ax79
% 64.62/10.52 % No. of inferences in proof: 28
% 64.62/10.52 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 9984 ms resp. 9515 ms w/o parsing
% 64.62/10.53 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 64.62/10.53 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------