%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : SWW969+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 11:08:26 EDT 2023

% Result   : CounterSatisfiable 7.93s 2.79s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : SWW969+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 19:10:28 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  % SZS status CounterSatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  Inference rules
% 7.93/2.79  ----------------------
% 7.93/2.79  #Ref     : 0
% 7.93/2.79  #Sup     : 232
% 7.93/2.79  #Fact    : 0
% 7.93/2.79  #Define  : 0
% 7.93/2.79  #Split   : 22
% 7.93/2.79  #Chain   : 0
% 7.93/2.79  #Close   : 0
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  Ordering : KBO
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  Simplification rules
% 7.93/2.79  ----------------------
% 7.93/2.79  #Subsume      : 1911
% 7.93/2.79  #Demod        : 77
% 7.93/2.79  #Tautology    : 63
% 7.93/2.79  #SimpNegUnit  : 1900
% 7.93/2.79  #BackRed      : 284
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 7.93/2.79  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 7.93/2.79  
% 7.93/2.79  Timing (in seconds)
% 7.93/2.79  ----------------------
% 7.93/2.79  Preprocessing        : 0.72
% 7.93/2.79  Parsing              : 0.38
% 7.93/2.79  CNF conversion       : 0.06
% 7.93/2.79  Main loop            : 1.03
% 7.93/2.79  Inferencing          : 0.36
% 7.93/2.79  Reduction            : 0.31
% 7.93/2.79  Demodulation         : 0.19
% 7.93/2.79  BG Simplification    : 0.04
% 7.93/2.79  Subsumption          : 0.23
% 7.93/2.79  Abstraction          : 0.04
% 7.93/2.79  MUC search           : 0.00
% 7.93/2.79  Cooper               : 0.00
% 7.93/2.80  Total                : 1.77
% 7.93/2.80  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 7.93/2.80  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 7.93/2.80  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 7.93/2.80  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------