TSTP Solution File: SWW967+1 by Enigma---0.5.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SWW967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:03:12 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.97s 2.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.97s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 10
% Number of leaves : 8
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 25 ( 6 unt; 0 nHn; 23 RR)
% Number of literals : 65 ( 0 equ; 42 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 42 ( 32 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_172,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_8(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_6(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_172) ).
cnf(i_0_121,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_8(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_121) ).
cnf(i_0_123,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_6(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_123) ).
cnf(i_0_125,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_125) ).
cnf(i_0_127,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_127) ).
cnf(i_0_168,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_1(name_A,name_B,name_Na(X1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_168) ).
cnf(i_0_110,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_110) ).
cnf(i_0_175,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-djaymzjr/input.p',i_0_175) ).
cnf(c_0_184,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_8(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_6(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X4)) ),
i_0_172 ).
cnf(c_0_185,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_8(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
i_0_121 ).
cnf(c_0_186,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_6(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_184,c_0_185]) ).
cnf(c_0_187,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_6(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
i_0_123 ).
cnf(c_0_188,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X3)
| ~ pred_attacker(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_186,c_0_187]) ).
cnf(c_0_189,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_4(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
i_0_125 ).
cnf(c_0_190,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X3)
| ~ pred_attacker(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_188,c_0_189]) ).
cnf(c_0_191,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_in_2(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
i_0_127 ).
cnf(c_0_192,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X3)
| ~ pred_attacker(X4) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_190,c_0_191]) ).
cnf(c_0_193,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_1(name_A,name_B,name_Na(X1))),
i_0_168 ).
cnf(c_0_194,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_192,c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_195,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_194,c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_196,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_195,c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_197,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(X1)) ),
i_0_110 ).
cnf(c_0_198,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_client_A_out_9(name_objective)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_196,c_0_193]) ).
cnf(c_0_199,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
i_0_175 ).
cnf(c_0_200,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_197,c_0_198]),c_0_199]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14 % Problem : SWW967+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 02:52:11 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.48 # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.97/2.49 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.97/2.49 # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.97/2.49 # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.97/2.49 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 7.97/2.49 # and selection function SelectComplexExceptUniqMaxHorn.
% 7.97/2.49 #
% 7.97/2.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.025 s
% 7.97/2.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 7.97/2.49
% 7.97/2.49 # Proof found!
% 7.97/2.49 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.97/2.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.97/2.49 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.97/2.49
% 7.97/2.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.97/2.49 # User time : 0.040 s
% 7.97/2.49 # System time : 0.009 s
% 7.97/2.49 # Total time : 0.050 s
% 7.97/2.49 # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.97/2.49
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------