TSTP Solution File: SWW965+1 by Vampire-SAT---4.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire-SAT---4.9
% Problem : SWW965+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire %s %d SAT
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 19:04:08 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.45s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 143 ( 66 ~; 53 |; 10 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 60 ( 60 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f722,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f558,f607,f658,f709,f721]) ).
fof(f721,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f720]) ).
fof(f720,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f719,f350]) ).
fof(f350,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).
fof(f190,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(flattening,[],[f189]) ).
fof(f189,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f188]) ).
fof(f188,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f719,plain,
( pred_attacker(name_objective)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f488,f548]) ).
fof(f548,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f546]) ).
fof(f546,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f488,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f292]) ).
fof(f292,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f219]) ).
fof(f219,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
=> pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f132]) ).
fof(f132,axiom,
! [X60] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X60))
=> pred_attacker(X60) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f709,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f660]) ).
fof(f660,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f659,f357]) ).
fof(f357,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f163]) ).
fof(f163,axiom,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f659,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f557,f473]) ).
fof(f473,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f277]) ).
fof(f277,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f138]) ).
fof(f138,axiom,
! [X69] :
( pred_attacker(X69)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X69)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f557,plain,
( ! [X2] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f556]) ).
fof(f556,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> ! [X2] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f658,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f609]) ).
fof(f609,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f608,f357]) ).
fof(f608,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f477,f554]) ).
fof(f554,plain,
( ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f553]) ).
fof(f553,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f477,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f281]) ).
fof(f281,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f208]) ).
fof(f208,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f140]) ).
fof(f140,axiom,
! [X71] :
( pred_attacker(X71)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X71)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f607,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f560]) ).
fof(f560,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f559,f357]) ).
fof(f559,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f475,f551]) ).
fof(f551,plain,
( ! [X3] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f550]) ).
fof(f550,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> ! [X3] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f475,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f279]) ).
fof(f279,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f206]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f142]) ).
fof(f142,axiom,
! [X73] :
( pred_attacker(X73)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X73)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f558,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f544,f556,f553,f550,f546]) ).
fof(f544,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f543,f496]) ).
fof(f496,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f227]) ).
fof(f227,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f104]) ).
fof(f104,axiom,
! [X23,X24] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X23,X24),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f543,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f542,f496]) ).
fof(f542,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f536,f496]) ).
fof(f536,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f349]) ).
fof(f349,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f348]) ).
fof(f348,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f266]) ).
fof(f266,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f185]) ).
fof(f185,axiom,
! [X115,X116,X117,X118] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X118))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X118,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X116))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X116,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X117))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X115),constr_adec(X117,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWW965+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.08/0.13 % Command : run_vampire %s %d SAT
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.35 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 09:38:09 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.37 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.12/0.37 Running first-order model finding
% 0.12/0.37 Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --mode casc_sat -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17280)ott+21_1:1_sil=4000:i=104:fsd=on:fd=off:newcnf=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/104Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17281)ott+11_8:59_sil=16000:sp=occurrence:lsd=20:abs=on:i=146:aac=none:nm=16:fdi=10:rawr=on:nicw=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/146Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17282)ott-4_1:1_sil=4000:sp=reverse_arity:lcm=predicate:newcnf=on:i=115:bce=on:fd=off:fs=off:fsr=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/115Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17279)fmb+10_1:1_sil=256000:fmbss=23:fmbes=contour:newcnf=on:fmbsr=1.14:i=152523:nm=2:gsp=on:rp=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/152523Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17276)fmb+10_1:1_sil=256000:i=98885:tgt=full:fmbsr=1.3:fmbss=10_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/98885Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17277)ott+10_10:1_add=off:afr=on:amm=off:anc=all:bd=off:bs=on:fsr=off:irw=on:lma=on:msp=off:nm=4:nwc=4.0:sac=on:sp=reverse_frequency:i=99418_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99418Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (17278)fmb+10_1:1_sil=256000:fmbes=contour:i=214858:bce=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/214858Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (17280)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.44 Detected minimum model sizes of [14]
% 0.22/0.44 Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 0.22/0.44 Detected minimum model sizes of [14]
% 0.22/0.44 Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 0.22/0.44 % (17280)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-17272"
% 0.22/0.45 Detected minimum model sizes of [14]
% 0.22/0.45 Detected maximum model sizes of [max]
% 0.22/0.45 % (17281)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.45 % (17272)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.45 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Memory used [KB]: 1066
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Time elapsed: 0.011 s
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (17280)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (17272)Success in time 0.072 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------