TSTP Solution File: SWW962+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.J1oEezuspC true
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.31s 0.80s
% Output : Refutation 1.31s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 14
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 28 ( 19 unt; 9 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 19 ( 11 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 63 ( 4 ~; 0 |; 0 &; 59 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 8 ( 8 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 11 ( 9 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 29 ( 0 ^; 29 !; 0 ?; 29 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_type,type,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_assoc_pair_type,type,
tuple_assoc_pair: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_2_type,type,
tuple_2: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(sk__type,type,
sk_: $i ).
thf(name_Nb_type,type,
name_Nb: $i > $i ).
thf(name_objective_type,type,
name_objective: $i ).
thf(pred_attacker_type,type,
pred_attacker: $i > $o ).
thf(constr_CONST_0x30_type,type,
constr_CONST_0x30: $i ).
thf(constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring_type,type,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring: $i > $i ).
thf(ax85,axiom,
! [VAR_X0X30_11: $i,VAR_X1_12: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1 @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ VAR_X0X30_11 @ VAR_X1_12 ) )
= VAR_X1_12 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl85,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1 @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X1 @ X0 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax85]) ).
thf(ax82,axiom,
! [VAR_X_17: $i,VAR_Y_18: $i,VAR_Z_0X30: $i] :
( ( tuple_assoc_pair @ VAR_X_17 @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ VAR_Y_18 @ VAR_Z_0X30 ) )
= ( tuple_assoc_pair @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ VAR_X_17 @ VAR_Y_18 ) @ VAR_Z_0X30 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl82,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X0 @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X1 @ X2 ) )
= ( tuple_assoc_pair @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X2 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax82]) ).
thf(ax84,axiom,
! [VAR_X0X30_13: $i,VAR_X1_14: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ VAR_X0X30_13 @ VAR_X1_14 ) )
= VAR_X0X30_13 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl84,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax84]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl557,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X2 @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X1 @ X0 ) ) )
= ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl82,zip_derived_cl84]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl84_001,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30_bitstring @ ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X0 @ X1 ) )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax84]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl558,plain,
! [X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( X2
= ( tuple_assoc_pair @ X2 @ X1 ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl557,zip_derived_cl84]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl562,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1 @ X1 )
= X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl85,zip_derived_cl558]) ).
thf(co0,conjecture,
! [VAR_V_711: $i] : ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_2 @ ( name_Nb @ VAR_V_711 ) @ name_objective ) ) ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [VAR_V_711: $i] : ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_2 @ ( name_Nb @ VAR_V_711 ) @ name_objective ) ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl176,plain,
~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_2 @ ( name_Nb @ sk_ ) @ name_objective ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl575,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1 @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl562,zip_derived_cl176]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl562_002,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1 @ X1 )
= X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl85,zip_derived_cl558]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl604,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl575,zip_derived_cl562]) ).
thf(ax151,axiom,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_0x30 ).
thf(zip_derived_cl151,plain,
pred_attacker @ constr_CONST_0x30,
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax151]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl624,plain,
$false,
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl604,zip_derived_cl151]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW962+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.J1oEezuspC true
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 20:26:42 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.21/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.65 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.65 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.65 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.73 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.74 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.94/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.94/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.31/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.31/0.80 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.31/0.80 % BCE start: 177
% 1.31/0.80 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 1.31/0.80 % PE start: 176
% 1.31/0.80 logic: eq
% 1.31/0.80 % PE eliminated: 3
% 1.31/0.80 % done 121 iterations in 0.038s
% 1.31/0.80 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.31/0.80 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.31/0.80
% 1.31/0.80
% 1.31/0.80 % Terminating...
% 1.76/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.76/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------