TSTP Solution File: SWW961+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW961+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:11:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.24s 1.42s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.24s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 15 ( 15 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 15 ( 14 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 2 ( 2 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 27 ( 7 sgn 14 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax83,axiom,
! [X12,X13] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X12,X13)) = X13,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax83) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
! [X9,X10,X11] : tuple_assoc_pair(X9,tuple_assoc_pair(X10,X11)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X9,X10),X11),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax82) ).
fof(ax86,axiom,
! [X18,X19] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30(tuple_assoc_pair(X18,X19)) = X18,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax86) ).
fof(ax0,axiom,
constr_CONST_0x30 != constr_CONST_1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax0) ).
fof(c_0_4,plain,
! [X14,X15] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X14,X15)) = X15,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax83]) ).
fof(c_0_5,plain,
! [X12,X13,X14] : tuple_assoc_pair(X12,tuple_assoc_pair(X13,X14)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X12,X13),X14),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax82]) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X20,X21] : constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30(tuple_assoc_pair(X20,X21)) = X20,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax86]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_1_bitstring(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,tuple_assoc_pair(X2,X3)) = tuple_assoc_pair(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30(tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2)) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
tuple_assoc_pair(X1,X2) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
constr_assoc_pair_2_get_0x30(X1) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
constr_CONST_0x30 != constr_CONST_1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax0]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
X1 = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : SWW961+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 14:58:55 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.24/1.42 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 177
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 89
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 88
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 88
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 88
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 88
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 88
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 9
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 79
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 1700
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3004 pages
% 0.24/1.42 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.24/1.42 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof found!
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.24/1.42 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object total steps : 15
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause steps : 8
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula steps : 7
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object conjectures : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object clause conjectures : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object formula conjectures : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object initial formulas used : 4
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object generating inferences : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3
% 0.24/1.42 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.24/1.42 # Parsed axioms : 177
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses : 177
% 0.24/1.42 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Initial clauses in saturation : 176
% 0.24/1.42 # Processed clauses : 180
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # ...remaining for further processing : 180
% 0.24/1.42 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-subsumed : 68
% 0.24/1.42 # Backward-rewritten : 10
% 0.24/1.42 # Generated clauses : 252
% 0.24/1.42 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 78
% 0.24/1.42 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Paramodulations : 174
% 0.24/1.42 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of processed clauses : 24
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.24/1.42 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Negative unit clauses : 1
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit-clauses : 2
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 22
% 0.24/1.42 # ...number of literals in the above : 25
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Current number of archived clauses : 157
% 0.24/1.42 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2597
% 0.24/1.42 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2534
% 0.24/1.42 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 59
% 0.24/1.42 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1343
% 0.24/1.42 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 126
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match attempts : 130
% 0.24/1.42 # BW rewrite match successes : 130
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.24/1.42 # Termbank termtop insertions : 7182
% 0.24/1.42
% 0.24/1.42 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.24/1.42 # User time : 0.024 s
% 0.24/1.42 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Total time : 0.026 s
% 0.24/1.42 # Maximum resident set size: 3764 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------