TSTP Solution File: SWW959+1 by Vampire---4.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.9
% Problem : SWW959+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_vampire %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon Jun 24 18:47:14 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.22s 0.44s
% Output : Refutation 0.22s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 55 ( 14 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 132 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 143 ( 66 ~; 53 |; 10 &)
% ( 4 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 12 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 7 ( 6 usr; 5 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 15 ( 15 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 62 ( 62 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f683,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f513,f564,f615,f625,f682]) ).
fof(f682,plain,
~ spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f628]) ).
fof(f628,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f626,f331]) ).
fof(f331,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f144]) ).
fof(f144,axiom,
pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f626,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f502,f433]) ).
fof(f433,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f255]) ).
fof(f255,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f185]) ).
fof(f185,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f120]) ).
fof(f120,axiom,
! [X60] :
( pred_attacker(X60)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X60)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f502,plain,
( ! [X2] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f501]) ).
fof(f501,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> ! [X2] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f625,plain,
~ spl0_4,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f624]) ).
fof(f624,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f623,f324]) ).
fof(f324,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f171]) ).
fof(f171,plain,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(flattening,[],[f170]) ).
fof(f170,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f169]) ).
fof(f169,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f623,plain,
( pred_attacker(name_objective)
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f446,f512]) ).
fof(f512,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f510]) ).
fof(f510,plain,
( spl0_4
<=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_4])]) ).
fof(f446,plain,
! [X0] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
| pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f268]) ).
fof(f268,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f198]) ).
fof(f198,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X0))
=> pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f114]) ).
fof(f114,axiom,
! [X51] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(X51))
=> pred_attacker(X51) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f615,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f566]) ).
fof(f566,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f565,f331]) ).
fof(f565,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f508,f435]) ).
fof(f435,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f257]) ).
fof(f257,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).
fof(f187,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f124]) ).
fof(f124,axiom,
! [X64] :
( pred_attacker(X64)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X64)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f508,plain,
( ! [X3] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f507]) ).
fof(f507,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> ! [X3] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f564,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f515]) ).
fof(f515,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f514,f331]) ).
fof(f514,plain,
( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f437,f505]) ).
fof(f505,plain,
( ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f504]) ).
fof(f504,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f437,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f259]) ).
fof(f259,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0))
| ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f189]) ).
fof(f189,plain,
! [X0] :
( pred_attacker(X0)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X0)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f122]) ).
fof(f122,axiom,
! [X62] :
( pred_attacker(X62)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X62)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f513,plain,
( spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3
| spl0_4 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f499,f510,f507,f504,f501]) ).
fof(f499,plain,
! [X2,X3,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f498,f454]) ).
fof(f454,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f206]) ).
fof(f206,plain,
! [X0,X1] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X0,X1),
inference(rectify,[],[f87]) ).
fof(f87,axiom,
! [X16,X17] : pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(X16,X17),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
fof(f498,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f497,f454]) ).
fof(f497,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f491,f454]) ).
fof(f491,plain,
! [X2,X3,X0,X1] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f323]) ).
fof(f323,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f322]) ).
fof(f322,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
| ~ pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f242]) ).
fof(f242,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2,X3] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X3))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X3,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X1))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X1,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X2))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X0),constr_adec(X2,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
inference(rectify,[],[f166]) ).
fof(f166,axiom,
! [X106,X107,X108,X109] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_2(X109))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_0x30(constr_checksign(X109,constr_pkey(name_skS))))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_3(X107))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_A,constr_tuple_2_get_1(constr_adec(X107,name_skB)))
& pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_in_5(X108))
& pred_eq_bitstring_bitstring(name_Nb(X106),constr_adec(X108,name_skB)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_client_B_out_6(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unknown) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.13 % Problem : SWW959+1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_vampire %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Wed Jun 19 07:40:39 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/0.36 This is a FOF_THM_RFO_SEQ problem
% 0.12/0.36 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.36 Running /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/vampire --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.22/0.44 % (28675)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (28676)lrs+1011_1:12_anc=none:drc=off:sil=64000:sims=off:sp=unary_first:spb=goal_then_units:lsd=20:rnwc=on:nwc=2.0:i=53554:add=off:awrs=converge:bd=off:uhcvi=on:tgt=ground:afp=300:afq=1.63_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/53554Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (28675)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (28680)dis+1011_3:1_sil=256000:tgt=ground:sac=on:i=109:sd=1:ss=included_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/109Mi)
% 0.22/0.44 % (28676)First to succeed.
% 0.22/0.44 % (28680)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.22/0.44 % (28676)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-28675"
% 0.22/0.44 % (28675)Running in auto input_syntax mode. Trying TPTP
% 0.22/0.44 % (28676)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.22/0.44 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.22/0.44 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Version: Vampire 4.9 (commit 18c118a85 on 2024-06-08 21:14:20 +0100)
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Linked with Z3 4.12.3.0 79bbbf76d0c123481c8ca05cd3a98939270074d3 z3-4.8.4-7980-g79bbbf76d
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.22/0.45
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Memory used [KB]: 1293
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Time elapsed: 0.010 s
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (28676)------------------------------
% 0.22/0.45 % (28675)Success in time 0.073 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------