TSTP Solution File: SWW957+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:29:24 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.18s 0.47s
% Output   : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;  41 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   61 (   0 equ;  24 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   17 (  17 usr;   8 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(3,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(10,axiom,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,u),constr_ZERO),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(59,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_ZERO),u),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(60,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | pred_attacker(constr_split(u)) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(61,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(u)) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(64,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,v),constr_xor(v,u)),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(66,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(v) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(68,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(v) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(69,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(u) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(71,axiom,
    equal(constr_split(constr_concat(u,v)),tuple_2(u,v)),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(74,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_C(u),constr_C(v)),constr_C(constr_xor(u,v))),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(75,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | ~ pred_attacker(v)
    | pred_attacker(constr_xor(v,u)) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(81,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_xor(u,v),w),constr_xor(u,constr_xor(v,w))),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(82,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(83,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_concat(u,v),constr_concat(w,x)),constr_concat(constr_xor(u,w),constr_xor(v,x))),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(84,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(u))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(u,constr_C(u)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
    file('SWW957+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(85,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,82]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:64.0,82.0')] ).

cnf(86,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(u))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(u,constr_C(u))))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,84]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:64.0,84.1')] ).

cnf(89,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_objective,u)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[69,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:69.1,10.0')] ).

cnf(100,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_ZERO,u),u),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,59]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:64.0,59.0')] ).

cnf(108,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_concat(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_2(u,v)) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[71,60]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:71.0,60.1')] ).

cnf(119,plain,
    equal(constr_C(constr_xor(u,u)),constr_ZERO),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[74,58]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:74.0,58.0')] ).

cnf(123,plain,
    equal(constr_C(constr_ZERO),constr_ZERO),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[58,119]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:58.0,119.0')] ).

cnf(196,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[85,68]),
    [iquote('0:Res:85.0,68.0')] ).

cnf(249,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_xor(u,v)),constr_xor(constr_ZERO,v)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[58,81]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:58.0,81.0')] ).

cnf(256,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_xor(u,v)),v),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[100,249]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:100.0,249.0')] ).

cnf(263,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(u,v))
    | ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | pred_attacker(v) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[256,75]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:256.0,75.2')] ).

cnf(300,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))
    | pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))) ),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[263,196]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:263.0,196.0')] ).

cnf(306,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab),constr_concat(constr_ZERO,constr_ZERO)))) ),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[123,86]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:123.0,86.1')] ).

cnf(311,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(constr_ZERO,constr_ZERO),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[64,306]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:64.0,306.1')] ).

cnf(328,plain,
    equal(constr_concat(constr_xor(u,u),constr_xor(v,v)),constr_ZERO),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[83,58]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:83.0,58.0')] ).

cnf(341,plain,
    equal(constr_concat(constr_ZERO,constr_ZERO),constr_ZERO),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[58,328]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:58.0,328.0,58.0,328.0')] ).

cnf(342,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_ZERO,constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[341,311]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:341.0,311.1')] ).

cnf(343,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[100,342]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:100.0,342.1')] ).

cnf(365,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[343,66]),
    [iquote('0:Res:343.1,66.0')] ).

cnf(366,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))) ),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[300,365]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:300.0,365.1')] ).

cnf(468,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_2(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))) ),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[108,366]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:108.0,366.1')] ).

cnf(470,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(constr_ZERO)),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[468,89]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:468.1,89.0')] ).

cnf(471,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[61,470]),
    [iquote('0:Res:61.1,470.0')] ).

cnf(472,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[471,3]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:471.0,3.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11  % Problem  : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 22:48:04 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.18/0.47  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.18/0.47  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.18/0.47  SPASS derived 271 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 161 clauses.
% 0.18/0.47  SPASS allocated 97999 KBytes.
% 0.18/0.47  SPASS spent	0:00:00.12 on the problem.
% 0.18/0.47  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.18/0.47  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.18/0.47  		0:00:00.01 for inferences.
% 0.18/0.47  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.18/0.47  		0:00:00.03 for the reduction.
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  
% 0.18/0.47  Here is a proof with depth 6, length 41 :
% 0.18/0.47  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.47  Formulae used in the proof : ax62 co0 ax48 ax49 ax54 ax59 ax50 ax58 ax72 ax74 ax45 ax47 ax52 ax51 ax82 ax46 ax81
% 0.18/0.47  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------