TSTP Solution File: SWW957+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:11:45 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 14
% Number of leaves : 18
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 73 ( 31 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 131 ( 19 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 107 ( 49 ~; 46 |; 2 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 10 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 14 ( 14 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 104 ( 7 sgn 50 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax49,axiom,
! [X10] : constr_xor(X10,constr_ZERO) = X10,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax49) ).
fof(ax50,axiom,
! [X11,X12] : constr_xor(X11,X12) = constr_xor(X12,X11),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax50) ).
fof(ax51,axiom,
! [X13,X14,X15] : constr_xor(X13,constr_xor(X14,X15)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X13,X14),X15),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax51) ).
fof(ax48,axiom,
! [X9] : constr_xor(X9,X9) = constr_ZERO,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax48) ).
fof(ax52,axiom,
! [X16,X17] :
( ( pred_attacker(X16)
& pred_attacker(X17) )
=> pred_attacker(constr_xor(X16,X17)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax52) ).
fof(ax72,axiom,
! [X36,X37] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X36,X37))
=> pred_attacker(X37) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax72) ).
fof(ax82,axiom,
pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax82) ).
fof(ax58,axiom,
! [X23,X24] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X23,X24))
=> pred_attacker(X24) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax58) ).
fof(ax81,axiom,
! [X50] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X50))
=> pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X50,constr_C(X50)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax81) ).
fof(ax61,axiom,
! [X27,X28] :
( ( pred_attacker(X27)
& pred_attacker(X28) )
=> pred_attacker(constr_concat(X27,X28)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax61) ).
fof(ax60,axiom,
! [X26] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X26))
=> pred_attacker(X26) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax60) ).
fof(ax74,axiom,
! [X40,X41] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_2(X40,X41))
=> pred_attacker(X40) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax74) ).
fof(ax45,axiom,
! [X1,X2] : constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)) = tuple_2(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax45) ).
fof(ax59,axiom,
! [X25] :
( pred_attacker(X25)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X25)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax59) ).
fof(ax69,axiom,
! [X31] :
( pred_attacker(X31)
=> pred_attacker(constr_C(X31)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax69) ).
fof(ax54,axiom,
! [X18] :
( pred_attacker(X18)
=> pred_attacker(constr_split(X18)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax54) ).
fof(ax80,axiom,
! [X49] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X49)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax80) ).
fof(co0,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co0) ).
fof(c_0_18,plain,
! [X11] : constr_xor(X11,constr_ZERO) = X11,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax49]) ).
fof(c_0_19,plain,
! [X13,X14] : constr_xor(X13,X14) = constr_xor(X14,X13),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax50]) ).
fof(c_0_20,plain,
! [X16,X17,X18] : constr_xor(X16,constr_xor(X17,X18)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X16,X17),X18),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax51]) ).
fof(c_0_21,plain,
! [X10] : constr_xor(X10,X10) = constr_ZERO,
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax48]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
constr_xor(X1,constr_ZERO) = X1,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
constr_xor(X1,X2) = constr_xor(X2,X1),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
fof(c_0_24,plain,
! [X18,X19] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X18)
| ~ pred_attacker(X19)
| pred_attacker(constr_xor(X18,X19)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax52])]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X1,X2),X3),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
constr_xor(X1,X1) = constr_ZERO,
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
constr_xor(constr_ZERO,X1) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X2,X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,plain,
constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,constr_xor(X1,X2))) = constr_ZERO,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).
fof(c_0_34,plain,
! [X38,X39] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X38,X39))
| pred_attacker(X39) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax72])]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X2,X3))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).
cnf(c_0_36,plain,
constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_33]),c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_37,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_34]) ).
cnf(c_0_38,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_B_out_1(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax82]) ).
fof(c_0_39,plain,
! [X25,X26] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X25,X26))
| pred_attacker(X26) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax58])]) ).
fof(c_0_40,plain,
! [X51] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X51))
| pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X51,constr_C(X51)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])]) ).
cnf(c_0_41,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X3,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]) ).
cnf(c_0_42,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_xor(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_38]) ).
cnf(c_0_43,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(X2,X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).
cnf(c_0_44,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_out_2(name_v,constr_xor(constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab))))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_40]) ).
cnf(c_0_45,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).
cnf(c_0_46,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_xor(constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1)),constr_RC4(name_v,name_Kab)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).
fof(c_0_47,plain,
! [X29,X30] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X29)
| ~ pred_attacker(X30)
| pred_attacker(constr_concat(X29,X30)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax61])]) ).
fof(c_0_48,plain,
! [X27] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X27))
| pred_attacker(X27) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax60])]) ).
fof(c_0_49,plain,
! [X42,X43] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(X42,X43))
| pred_attacker(X42) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax74])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_50,plain,
! [X3,X4] : constr_split(constr_concat(X3,X4)) = tuple_2(X3,X4),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax45]) ).
cnf(c_0_51,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_concat(X1,constr_C(X1)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).
cnf(c_0_52,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_concat(X1,X2))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2)
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_47]) ).
cnf(c_0_53,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_48]) ).
fof(c_0_54,plain,
! [X26] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X26)
| pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X26)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax59])]) ).
fof(c_0_55,plain,
! [X32] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X32)
| pred_attacker(constr_C(X32)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax69])]) ).
cnf(c_0_56,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_2(X1,X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_49]) ).
cnf(c_0_57,plain,
constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2)) = tuple_2(X1,X2),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_50]) ).
fof(c_0_58,plain,
! [X19] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X19)
| pred_attacker(constr_split(X19)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax54])]) ).
cnf(c_0_59,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_C(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_60,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_enc_oracle_in_1(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_54]) ).
cnf(c_0_61,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_C(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_55]) ).
fof(c_0_62,plain,
! [X50] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X50)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax80]) ).
fof(c_0_63,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).
cnf(c_0_64,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_split(constr_concat(X1,X2))) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_56,c_0_57]) ).
cnf(c_0_65,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_split(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_58]) ).
cnf(c_0_66,plain,
( pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective)))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_59,c_0_60]),c_0_61]) ).
cnf(c_0_67,plain,
pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_62]) ).
fof(c_0_68,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_63]) ).
cnf(c_0_69,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(constr_concat(X1,X2)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_64,c_0_65]) ).
cnf(c_0_70,plain,
pred_attacker(constr_concat(name_objective,constr_C(name_objective))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_66,c_0_67]) ).
cnf(c_0_71,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_68]) ).
cnf(c_0_72,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_69,c_0_70]),c_0_71]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SWW957+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 22:44:20 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.44 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_29fa5c60d0ee03ec4f64b055553dc135fbe4ee3a for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.018 s
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object total steps : 73
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause steps : 37
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula steps : 36
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial clauses used : 18
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object initial formulas used : 18
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object generating inferences : 18
% 0.25/1.44 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 6
% 0.25/1.44 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.44 # Parsed axioms : 84
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses : 84
% 0.25/1.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.25/1.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 83
% 0.25/1.44 # Processed clauses : 623
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of these trivial : 64
% 0.25/1.44 # ...subsumed : 378
% 0.25/1.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 181
% 0.25/1.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-subsumed : 5
% 0.25/1.44 # Backward-rewritten : 9
% 0.25/1.44 # Generated clauses : 4671
% 0.25/1.44 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 4165
% 0.25/1.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 31
% 0.25/1.44 # Paramodulations : 4671
% 0.25/1.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 167
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 37
% 0.25/1.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 10
% 0.25/1.44 # Negative unit clauses : 47
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 73
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3050
% 0.25/1.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 6832
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 15
% 0.25/1.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 15388
% 0.25/1.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12640
% 0.25/1.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 305
% 0.25/1.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 401
% 0.25/1.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 122
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 201
% 0.25/1.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 144
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 73082
% 0.25/1.44
% 0.25/1.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.44 # User time : 0.088 s
% 0.25/1.44 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Total time : 0.094 s
% 0.25/1.44 # Maximum resident set size: 6416 pages
% 0.25/23.44 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.46 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.47 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.48 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.49 eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.50 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.51 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.52 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.25/23.53 eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------