TSTP Solution File: SWW956+1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : SWW956+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVLV3WgXdT true
% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 1 01:43:32 EDT 2023
% Result : Theorem 1.12s 0.81s
% Output : Refutation 1.12s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 23
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 43 ( 13 unt; 13 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 51 ( 2 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 167 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 1 &; 127 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 6 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 10 ( 6 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 14 ( 14 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 15 ( 13 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 ^; 26 !; 0 ?; 26 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(name_Na_type,type,
name_Na: $i ).
thf(constr_dec_type,type,
constr_dec: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_A_in_3_type,type,
tuple_A_in_3: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_A_out_1_type,type,
tuple_A_out_1: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(name_G_8_type,type,
name_G_8: $i ).
thf(constr_enc_type,type,
constr_enc: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(name_objective_type,type,
name_objective: $i ).
thf(constr_mod_type,type,
constr_mod: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(constr_exp_type,type,
constr_exp: $i > $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_A_out_2_type,type,
tuple_A_out_2: $i > $i ).
thf(tuple_A_out_4_type,type,
tuple_A_out_4: $i > $i ).
thf(name_P_7_type,type,
name_P_7: $i ).
thf(pred_attacker_type,type,
pred_attacker: $i > $o ).
thf(ax90,axiom,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_2 @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ name_G_8 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl90,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_2 @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ name_G_8 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax90]) ).
thf(ax78,axiom,
! [VAR_V_82: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_2 @ VAR_V_82 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_82 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl78,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_2 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax78]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl234,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ name_G_8 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl90,zip_derived_cl78]) ).
thf(ax82,axiom,
! [VAR_V_10X301: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_10X301 )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ VAR_V_10X301 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl82,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax82]) ).
thf(ax91,axiom,
! [VAR_B_186: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ VAR_B_186 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_4 @ ( constr_enc @ name_objective @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ VAR_B_186 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl91,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_4 @ ( constr_enc @ name_objective @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ X0 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax91]) ).
thf(ax76,axiom,
! [VAR_V_76: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_4 @ VAR_V_76 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_76 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl76,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_4 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax76]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl241,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ X0 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_enc @ name_objective @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ X0 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl91,zip_derived_cl76]) ).
thf(ax55,axiom,
! [VAR_K_0X30: $i,VAR_M_0X30: $i] :
( ( constr_dec @ ( constr_enc @ VAR_M_0X30 @ VAR_K_0X30 ) @ VAR_K_0X30 )
= VAR_M_0X30 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl55,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( constr_dec @ ( constr_enc @ X0 @ X1 ) @ X1 )
= X0 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax55]) ).
thf(ax62,axiom,
! [VAR_V_42: $i,VAR_V_43: $i] :
( ( ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_42 )
& ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_43 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_dec @ VAR_V_42 @ VAR_V_43 ) ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl62,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ X1 )
| ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_dec @ X0 @ X1 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax62]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl246,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_enc @ X0 @ X1 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ X1 )
| ( pred_attacker @ X0 ) ),
inference('s_sup+',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl55,zip_derived_cl62]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl249,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ X0 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) )
| ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl241,zip_derived_cl246]) ).
thf(co0,conjecture,
pred_attacker @ name_objective ).
thf(zf_stmt_0,negated_conjecture,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference('cnf.neg',[status(esa)],[co0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl93,plain,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_objective ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[zf_stmt_0]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl252,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_in_3 @ X0 ) )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ X0 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ),
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl249,zip_derived_cl93]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl255,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( constr_mod @ ( constr_exp @ X0 @ name_Na ) @ name_P_7 ) ) ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl82,zip_derived_cl252]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl257,plain,
~ ( pred_attacker @ name_G_8 ),
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl234,zip_derived_cl255]) ).
thf(ax89,axiom,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_1 @ name_P_7 @ name_G_8 ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl89,plain,
pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_1 @ name_P_7 @ name_G_8 ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax89]) ).
thf(ax81,axiom,
! [VAR_V_97: $i,VAR_V_98: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_1 @ VAR_V_97 @ VAR_V_98 ) )
=> ( pred_attacker @ VAR_V_98 ) ) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl81,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( pred_attacker @ X0 )
| ~ ( pred_attacker @ ( tuple_A_out_1 @ X1 @ X0 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[ax81]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl245,plain,
pred_attacker @ name_G_8,
inference('s_sup-',[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl89,zip_derived_cl81]) ).
thf(zip_derived_cl261,plain,
$false,
inference(demod,[status(thm)],[zip_derived_cl257,zip_derived_cl245]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13 % Problem : SWW956+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.rVLV3WgXdT true
% 0.15/0.35 % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Aug 27 17:50:04 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.15/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.15/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.15/0.36 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.15/0.36 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.67 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.67 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.76 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.22/0.77 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.12/0.78 % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.12/0.81 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.12/0.81 % BCE start: 94
% 1.12/0.81 % BCE eliminated: 1
% 1.12/0.81 % PE start: 93
% 1.12/0.81 logic: eq
% 1.12/0.81 % PE eliminated: 2
% 1.12/0.81 % done 95 iterations in 0.025s
% 1.12/0.81 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.12/0.81 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 1.12/0.81
% 1.12/0.81
% 1.12/0.81 % Terminating...
% 1.51/0.88 % Runner terminated.
% 1.51/0.89 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------