TSTP Solution File: SWW956+1 by ET---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SWW956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:11:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.23s 1.42s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.23s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   61 (   3 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  23   ~;  18   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   6  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   1 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax62,axiom,
    ! [X13,X14] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X13)
        & pred_attacker(X14) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_dec(X13,X14)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax62) ).

fof(ax55,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : constr_dec(constr_enc(X2,X1),X1) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax55) ).

fof(ax76,axiom,
    ! [X26] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(X26))
     => pred_attacker(X26) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax76) ).

fof(ax91,axiom,
    ! [X43] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X43))
     => pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective,constr_mod(constr_exp(X43,name_Na),name_P_7)))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax91) ).

fof(co0,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co0) ).

fof(ax78,axiom,
    ! [X28] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_2(X28))
     => pred_attacker(X28) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax78) ).

fof(ax90,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_2(constr_mod(constr_exp(name_G_8,name_Na),name_P_7))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax90) ).

fof(ax81,axiom,
    ! [X33,X34] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(X33,X34))
     => pred_attacker(X34) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax81) ).

fof(ax82,axiom,
    ! [X35] :
      ( pred_attacker(X35)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X35)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax82) ).

fof(ax89,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(name_P_7,name_G_8)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax89) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X15,X16] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X15)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X16)
      | pred_attacker(constr_dec(X15,X16)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax62])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : constr_dec(constr_enc(X4,X3),X3) = X4,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax55]) ).

fof(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X27] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(X27))
      | pred_attacker(X27) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax76])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X44] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X44))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective,constr_mod(constr_exp(X44,name_Na),name_P_7)))) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax91])]) ).

fof(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_dec(X1,X2))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2)
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    constr_dec(constr_enc(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_4(constr_enc(name_objective,constr_mod(constr_exp(X1,name_Na),name_P_7))))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_14]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X29] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_2(X29))
      | pred_attacker(X29) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax78])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_enc(X1,X2))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_enc(name_objective,constr_mod(constr_exp(X1,name_Na),name_P_7)))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_2(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_2(constr_mod(constr_exp(name_G_8,name_Na),name_P_7))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax90]) ).

fof(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(X35,X36))
      | pred_attacker(X36) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax81])]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_mod(constr_exp(X1,name_Na),name_P_7))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_mod(constr_exp(name_G_8,name_Na),name_P_7)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

fof(c_0_29,plain,
    ! [X36] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X36)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X36)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax82])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_A_out_1(name_P_7,name_G_8)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax89]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(name_G_8)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_A_in_3(X1))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_G_8),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33]),c_0_34])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWW956+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 11:31:47 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.23/1.42  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 32
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 62
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 62
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 62
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 62
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 62
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 6
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 56
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 907
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2784 pages
% 0.23/1.42  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.23/1.42  # Preprocessing time       : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof found!
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.23/1.42  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object total steps             : 36
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause steps            : 17
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula steps           : 19
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object conjectures             : 4
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 10
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object generating inferences   : 7
% 0.23/1.42  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 3
% 0.23/1.42  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.23/1.42  # Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses                      : 94
% 0.23/1.42  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 94
% 0.23/1.42  # Processed clauses                    : 104
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # ...subsumed                          : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # ...remaining for further processing  : 103
% 0.23/1.42  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Generated clauses                    : 60
% 0.23/1.42  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 48
% 0.23/1.42  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Paramodulations                      : 60
% 0.23/1.42  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of processed clauses  : 102
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 16
% 0.23/1.42  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.23/1.42  #    Negative unit clauses             : 57
% 0.23/1.42  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 28
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 38
% 0.23/1.42  # ...number of literals in the above   : 99
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Current number of archived clauses   : 1
% 0.23/1.42  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 288
% 0.23/1.42  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 285
% 0.23/1.42  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.23/1.42  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 267
% 0.23/1.42  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.23/1.42  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3231
% 0.23/1.42  
% 0.23/1.42  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.23/1.42  # User time                : 0.016 s
% 0.23/1.42  # System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Total time               : 0.019 s
% 0.23/1.42  # Maximum resident set size: 2996 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------