TSTP Solution File: SWW952+1 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWW952+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:29:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 5.93s 6.14s
% Output   : Refutation 5.93s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   35 (  25 unt;   0 nHn;  35 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   47 (   0 equ;  19 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   20 (  20 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(11,axiom,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(14,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_1(name_r1_s1)),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(106,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(constr_QUERY,name_r1)),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(107,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,u),constr_ZERO),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(108,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_ZERO),u),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(114,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_1(u))
    | pred_attacker(u) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(117,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(u))
    | pred_attacker(u) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(120,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(u,v),constr_xor(v,u)),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(121,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(u) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(122,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(v) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(124,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(u,v))
    | pred_attacker(v) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(129,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | ~ pred_attacker(v)
    | pred_attacker(constr_xor(v,u)) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(133,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | ~ pred_attacker(v)
    | pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(v,u)) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(134,axiom,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_xor(u,v),w),constr_xor(u,constr_xor(v,w))),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(136,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(name_r2_s1,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1),name_k))),constr_h(constr_xor(constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1),name_k)))))),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(137,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(u,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(constr_xor(name_r1,u),name_k))),constr_h(constr_xor(constr_xor(name_r1,u),name_k))))))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    file('SWW952+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(140,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(name_r2_s1,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1_s1,constr_xor(name_k,name_r2_s1))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1_s1,constr_xor(name_k,name_r2_s1)))))))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[120,136,134]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:120.0,136.0,120.0,136.0,134.0,136.0')] ).

cnf(141,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(u,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(u,name_k))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(u,name_k))))))))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[134,137,120]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:134.0,137.0,120.0,137.0')] ).

cnf(148,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[117,11]),
    [iquote('0:Res:117.1,11.0')] ).

cnf(154,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(u,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(u,name_k))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(u,name_k)))))))),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[141,148]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:141.1,148.0')] ).

cnf(164,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_r1_s1),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[14,114]),
    [iquote('0:Res:14.0,114.0')] ).

cnf(167,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_r1),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[106,124]),
    [iquote('0:Res:106.0,124.0')] ).

cnf(169,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(constr_ZERO,u),u),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[120,108]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:120.0,108.0')] ).

cnf(212,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_xor(v,w)),constr_xor(w,constr_xor(u,v))),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[134,120]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:134.0,120.0')] ).

cnf(218,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_xor(u,v)),constr_xor(constr_ZERO,v)),
    inference(spr,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[107,134]),
    [iquote('0:SpR:107.0,134.0')] ).

cnf(224,plain,
    equal(constr_xor(u,constr_xor(u,v)),v),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[169,218]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:169.0,218.0')] ).

cnf(225,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(u,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1,u))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1,u)))))))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[212,154]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:212.0,154.0')] ).

cnf(227,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(name_r2_s1,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r2_s1,name_r1_s1))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r2_s1,name_r1_s1)))))))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[212,140]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:212.0,140.0')] ).

cnf(232,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_sess_1_out_2(name_r2_s1,constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1)))))))),
    inference(rew,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[120,227]),
    [iquote('0:Rew:120.0,227.0')] ).

cnf(272,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_r2_s1),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[232,121]),
    [iquote('0:Res:232.0,121.0')] ).

cnf(273,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1))),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1))))))),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[232,122]),
    [iquote('0:Res:232.0,122.0')] ).

cnf(507,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(constr_xor(name_r1,u),constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,u)),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,u))))))),
    inference(spl,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[224,225]),
    [iquote('0:SpL:224.0,225.0')] ).

cnf(3713,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(constr_split_L(constr_xor(constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,u)),constr_rotate(name_ID,constr_h(constr_xor(name_k,u))))))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_r1,u)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[133,507]),
    [iquote('0:Res:133.2,507.0')] ).

cnf(11809,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(name_r1_s1,name_r2_s1))),
    inference(sor,[status(thm)],[3713,273]),
    [iquote('0:SoR:3713.0,273.0')] ).

cnf(11811,plain,
    $false,
    inference(ssi,[status(thm)],[11809,129,167,164,272]),
    [iquote('0:SSi:11809.0,129.0,167.0,129.2,164.0,272.2')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13  % Problem  : SWW952+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 19:19:32 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.93/6.14  
% 5.93/6.14  SPASS V 3.9 
% 5.93/6.14  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 5.93/6.14  % SZS status Theorem
% 5.93/6.14  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 5.93/6.14  SPASS derived 7112 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 1033 clauses.
% 5.93/6.14  SPASS allocated 105997 KBytes.
% 5.93/6.14  SPASS spent	0:00:05.72 on the problem.
% 5.93/6.14  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 5.93/6.14  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 5.93/6.14  		0:00:00.08 for inferences.
% 5.93/6.14  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 5.93/6.14  		0:00:05.54 for the reduction.
% 5.93/6.14  
% 5.93/6.14  
% 5.93/6.14  Here is a proof with depth 4, length 35 :
% 5.93/6.14  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 5.93/6.14  Formulae used in the proof : co0 ax131 ax134 ax91 ax92 ax105 ax111 ax93 ax102 ax103 ax116 ax95 ax117 ax94 ax132 ax136
% 5.93/6.14  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------