TSTP Solution File: SWW951+1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 19:25:04 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   48 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   92 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   85 (  41   ~;  29   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   5 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    7 (   6 usr;   6 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (  33   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f251,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f185,f193,f215,f246,f250]) ).

fof(f250,plain,
    ~ spl1_4,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f249]) ).

fof(f249,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f247,f159]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).

fof(f74,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(flattening,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f67,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f66]) ).

fof(f66,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(f247,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(name_objective)
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(resolution,[],[f158,f192]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ spl1_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f190]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ( spl1_4
  <=> pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_4])]) ).

fof(f158,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X0))
      | pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f89]) ).

fof(f89,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f73]) ).

fof(f73,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X0))
     => pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f47]) ).

fof(f47,axiom,
    ! [X11] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X11))
     => pred_attacker(X11) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax46) ).

fof(f246,plain,
    ~ spl1_2,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f225]) ).

fof(f225,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f112,f219]) ).

fof(f219,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f175,f184]) ).

fof(f184,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
    | ~ spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f183]) ).

fof(f183,plain,
    ( spl1_2
  <=> ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_2])]) ).

fof(f175,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f104]) ).

fof(f104,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f83]) ).

fof(f83,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f52]) ).

fof(f52,axiom,
    ! [X16] :
      ( pred_attacker(X16)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X16)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax51) ).

fof(f112,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_2),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f56]) ).

fof(f56,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax55) ).

fof(f215,plain,
    ~ spl1_3,
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f199]) ).

fof(f199,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f125,f194]) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(X0)
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f138,f188]) ).

fof(f188,plain,
    ( ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1))
    | ~ spl1_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f187]) ).

fof(f187,plain,
    ( spl1_3
  <=> ! [X1] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1)) ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_3])]) ).

fof(f138,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f96]) ).

fof(f96,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0))
      | ~ pred_attacker(X0) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f71]) ).

fof(f71,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(X0)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f50]) ).

fof(f50,axiom,
    ! [X14] :
      ( pred_attacker(X14)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X14)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax49) ).

fof(f125,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_3),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f55]) ).

fof(f55,axiom,
    pred_attacker(constr_CONST_3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax54) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ( spl1_3
    | spl1_4
    | ~ spl1_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f177,f179,f190,f187]) ).

fof(f179,plain,
    ( spl1_1
  <=> sP0 ),
    introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl1_1])]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    ! [X1] :
      ( ~ sP0
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(general_splitting,[],[f171,f176_D]) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
      | sP0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f176_D]) ).

fof(f176_D,plain,
    ( ! [X0] : ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
  <=> ~ sP0 ),
    introduced(general_splitting_component_introduction,[new_symbols(naming,[sP0])]) ).

fof(f171,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).

fof(f110,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X0))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f93]) ).

fof(f93,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0)) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f92]) ).

fof(f92,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0)) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f84]) ).

fof(f84,plain,
    ! [X1,X0] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X0)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f65]) ).

fof(f65,axiom,
    ! [X25,X26] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X26))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X25)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax64) ).

fof(f185,plain,
    ( spl1_1
    | spl1_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f176,f183,f179]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12  % Problem    : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 30 21:17:05 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.44  % (10698)ott+2_1:1_fsr=off:gsp=on:i=50:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/50Mi)
% 0.19/0.44  % (10704)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.44  % (10704)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Time elapsed: 0.063 s
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)Instructions burned: 5 (million)
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (10704)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.45  % (10687)Success in time 0.105 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------