%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:29:23 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.45s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    6
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   12 (   6 unt;   0 nHn;  12 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   19 (   0 equ;  13 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-1 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(10,axiom,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(12,axiom,
    pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(u)),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(53,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(u))
    | pred_attacker(u) ),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(56,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(u)) ),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(58,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(u)) ),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(66,axiom,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(u))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(v))
    | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    file('SWW951+1.p',unknown),
    [] ).

cnf(67,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[53,10]),
    [iquote('0:Res:53.1,10.0')] ).

cnf(72,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(u))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(v)) ),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[66,67]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:66.2,67.0')] ).

cnf(97,plain,
    ( ~ pred_attacker(u)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(v)) ),
    inference(res,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[56,72]),
    [iquote('0:Res:56.1,72.0')] ).

cnf(98,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(u)),
    inference(con,[status(thm)],[97]),
    [iquote('0:Con:97.0')] ).

cnf(99,plain,
    ~ pred_attacker(u),
    inference(mrr,[status(thm)],[58,98]),
    [iquote('0:MRR:58.1,98.0')] ).

cnf(100,plain,
    $false,
    inference(unc,[status(thm)],[99,12]),
    [iquote('0:UnC:99.0,12.0')] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12  % Problem  : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.11/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 16:24:23 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS V 3.9 
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.19/0.45  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS derived 32 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 76 clauses.
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS allocated 97719 KBytes.
% 0.19/0.45  SPASS spent	0:00:00.10 on the problem.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.03 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for inferences.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 0.19/0.45  		0:00:00.00 for the reduction.
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  
% 0.19/0.45  Here is a proof with depth 1, length 12 :
% 0.19/0.45  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.45  Formulae used in the proof : co0 ax62 ax46 ax49 ax51 ax64
% 0.19/0.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------