TSTP Solution File: SWW951+1 by PyRes---1.5
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:46:50 EDT 2024
% Result : Theorem 0.69s 0.88s
% Output : Refutation 0.69s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Wed May 8 23:22:23 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.69/0.88 % Version: 1.5
% 0.69/0.88 % SZS status Theorem
% 0.69/0.88 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.69/0.88 fof(co0,conjecture,pred_attacker(name_objective),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', co0)).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c10,negated_conjecture,(~pred_attacker(name_objective)),inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c11,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c10])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c11])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax46,axiom,(![VAR_V_35]:(pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(VAR_V_35))=>pred_attacker(VAR_V_35))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax46)).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c57,plain,(![VAR_V_35]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(VAR_V_35))|pred_attacker(VAR_V_35))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax46])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c58,plain,(![X17]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X17))|pred_attacker(X17))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c57])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c59,plain,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X80))|pred_attacker(X80),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c58])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax57,axiom,pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax57)).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c34,plain,pred_attacker(constr_CONST_0x30),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax57])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax49,axiom,(![VAR_V_44]:(pred_attacker(VAR_V_44)=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_V_44)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax49)).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c48,plain,(![VAR_V_44]:(~pred_attacker(VAR_V_44)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_V_44)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax49])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c49,plain,(![X14]:(~pred_attacker(X14)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X14)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c48])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c50,plain,~pred_attacker(X73)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X73)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c49])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c181,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(constr_CONST_0x30)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c50, c34])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax43,axiom,pred_attacker(tuple_false),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax43)).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c64,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_false),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax43])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax51,axiom,(![VAR_V_50X30]:(pred_attacker(VAR_V_50X30)=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_V_50X30)))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax51)).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c42,plain,(![VAR_V_50X30]:(~pred_attacker(VAR_V_50X30)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_V_50X30)))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax51])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c43,plain,(![X12]:(~pred_attacker(X12)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X12)))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c42])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c44,plain,~pred_attacker(X58)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X58)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c43])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c130,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(tuple_false)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c44, c64])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(ax64,axiom,(![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:(![VAR_R1_10X306]:((pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305))&pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306)))=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', ax64)).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c13,plain,(![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:(![VAR_R1_10X306]:((~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306)))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax64])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c14,plain,(((![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305)))|(![VAR_R1_10X306]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306))))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[c13])).
% 0.69/0.88 fof(c16,plain,(![X2]:(![X3]:((~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X2))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X3)))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[fof(c15,plain,(((![X2]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X2)))|(![X3]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X3))))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))),inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c14])).])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c17,plain,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X68))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X67))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c16])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c151,plain,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X117))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c17, c130])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c844,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c151, c181])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c862,plain,pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c844, c59])).
% 0.69/0.88 cnf(c866,plain,$false,inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c862, c12])).
% 0.69/0.88 % SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.69/0.88
% 0.69/0.88 % Initial clauses : 79
% 0.69/0.88 % Processed clauses : 154
% 0.69/0.88 % Factors computed : 5
% 0.69/0.88 % Resolvents computed: 751
% 0.69/0.88 % Tautologies deleted: 3
% 0.69/0.88 % Forward subsumed : 56
% 0.69/0.88 % Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.69/0.88 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.69/0.88 % User time : 0.500 s
% 0.69/0.88 % System time : 0.022 s
% 0.69/0.88 % Total time : 0.522 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------