TSTP Solution File: SWW951+1 by PyRes---1.3
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.3
% Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:19:34 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.55s 0.78s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 16:13:37 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.55/0.78 # Version: 1.3
% 0.55/0.78 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.55/0.78 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% 0.55/0.78 fof(co0,conjecture,pred_attacker(name_objective),input).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c10,negated_conjecture,(~pred_attacker(name_objective)),inference(assume_negation,status(cth),[co0])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c11,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(fof_simplification,status(thm),[c10])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c12,negated_conjecture,~pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c11])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax46,axiom,(![VAR_V_35]:(pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(VAR_V_35))=>pred_attacker(VAR_V_35))),input).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c57,axiom,(![VAR_V_35]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(VAR_V_35))|pred_attacker(VAR_V_35))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax46])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c58,axiom,(![X17]:(~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X17))|pred_attacker(X17))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c57])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c59,axiom,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X80))|pred_attacker(X80),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c58])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax44,axiom,pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),input).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c63,axiom,pred_attacker(constr_ZERO),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[ax44])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax49,axiom,(![VAR_V_44]:(pred_attacker(VAR_V_44)=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_V_44)))),input).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c48,axiom,(![VAR_V_44]:(~pred_attacker(VAR_V_44)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_V_44)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax49])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c49,axiom,(![X14]:(~pred_attacker(X14)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X14)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c48])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c50,axiom,~pred_attacker(X73)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X73)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c49])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c191,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(constr_ZERO)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c50, c63])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax55,axiom,pred_attacker(constr_CONST_2),input).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c36,axiom,pred_attacker(constr_CONST_2),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[ax55])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax51,axiom,(![VAR_V_50X30]:(pred_attacker(VAR_V_50X30)=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_V_50X30)))),input).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c42,axiom,(![VAR_V_50X30]:(~pred_attacker(VAR_V_50X30)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_V_50X30)))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax51])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c43,axiom,(![X12]:(~pred_attacker(X12)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X12)))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c42])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c44,axiom,~pred_attacker(X58)|pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X58)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c43])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c127,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(constr_CONST_2)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c44, c36])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(ax64,axiom,(![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:(![VAR_R1_10X306]:((pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305))&pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306)))=>pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),input).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c13,axiom,(![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:(![VAR_R1_10X306]:((~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306)))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),inference(fof_nnf,status(thm),[ax64])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c14,axiom,(((![VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(VAR_K_XOR_K1_10X305)))|(![VAR_R1_10X306]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(VAR_R1_10X306))))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[c13])).
% 0.55/0.78 fof(c16,axiom,(![X2]:(![X3]:((~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X2))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X3)))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))))),inference(shift_quantors,status(thm),[fof(c15,axiom,(((![X2]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X2)))|(![X3]:~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X3))))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))),inference(variable_rename,status(thm),[c14])).])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c17,axiom,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X68))|~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X67))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(split_conjunct,status(thm),[c16])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c149,plain,~pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X113))|pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c17, c127])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c747,plain,pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c149, c191])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c760,plain,pred_attacker(name_objective),inference(resolution,status(thm),[c747, c59])).
% 0.55/0.78 cnf(c772,plain,$false,inference(resolution,status(thm),[c760, c12])).
% 0.55/0.78 # SZS output end CNFRefutation
% 0.55/0.78
% 0.55/0.78 # Initial clauses : 79
% 0.55/0.78 # Processed clauses : 143
% 0.55/0.78 # Factors computed : 0
% 0.55/0.78 # Resolvents computed: 657
% 0.55/0.78 # Tautologies deleted: 2
% 0.55/0.78 # Forward subsumed : 56
% 0.55/0.78 # Backward subsumed : 2
% 0.55/0.78 # -------- CPU Time ---------
% 0.55/0.78 # User time : 0.428 s
% 0.55/0.78 # System time : 0.016 s
% 0.55/0.78 # Total time : 0.444 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------