TSTP Solution File: SWW951+1 by ET---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : ET---2.0
% Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_ET %s %d
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:11:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 0.25s 1.43s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.25s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 24 ( 9 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 44 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 38 ( 18 ~; 15 |; 1 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 4 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 6 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 1 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 23 ( 8 sgn 12 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax64,axiom,
! [X26,X27] :
( ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X26))
& pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X27)) )
=> pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax64) ).
fof(ax49,axiom,
! [X15] :
( pred_attacker(X15)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X15)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax49) ).
fof(ax51,axiom,
! [X17] :
( pred_attacker(X17)
=> pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X17)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax51) ).
fof(ax62,axiom,
! [X24] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X24)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax62) ).
fof(co0,conjecture,
pred_attacker(name_objective),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',co0) ).
fof(ax46,axiom,
! [X12] :
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X12))
=> pred_attacker(X12) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',ax46) ).
fof(c_0_6,plain,
! [X28,X29] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X28))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X29))
| pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax64])])])]) ).
fof(c_0_7,plain,
! [X16] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X16)
| pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X16)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax49])]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X2)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).
fof(c_0_10,plain,
! [X18] :
( ~ pred_attacker(X18)
| pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X18)) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax51])]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).
fof(c_0_13,plain,
! [X25] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X25)),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax62]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X1)),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0]) ).
fof(c_0_17,plain,
! [X13] :
( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X13))
| pred_attacker(X13) ),
inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax46])]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
| ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).
fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( pred_attacker(X1)
| ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X1)) ),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : run_ET %s %d
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 16:13:07 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.25/1.43 # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 66
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 22
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 44
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 44
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 44
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 44
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 44
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 7
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 37
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 622
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.011 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2724 pages
% 0.25/1.43 # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.25/1.43 # Preprocessing time : 0.015 s
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof found!
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS status Theorem
% 0.25/1.43 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object total steps : 24
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause steps : 11
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula steps : 13
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object conjectures : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial clauses used : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object initial formulas used : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object generating inferences : 5
% 0.25/1.43 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.25/1.43 # Parsed axioms : 66
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses : 66
% 0.25/1.43 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Initial clauses in saturation : 66
% 0.25/1.43 # Processed clauses : 81
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # ...subsumed : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # ...remaining for further processing : 77
% 0.25/1.43 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 0.25/1.43 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Generated clauses : 92
% 0.25/1.43 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 76
% 0.25/1.43 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Paramodulations : 92
% 0.25/1.43 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of processed clauses : 73
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 16
% 0.25/1.43 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.25/1.43 # Negative unit clauses : 37
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit-clauses : 19
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 19
% 0.25/1.43 # ...number of literals in the above : 33
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Current number of archived clauses : 4
% 0.25/1.43 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 277
% 0.25/1.43 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 262
% 0.25/1.43 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 6
% 0.25/1.43 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54
% 0.25/1.43 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match attempts : 10
% 0.25/1.43 # BW rewrite match successes : 9
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.25/1.43 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2284
% 0.25/1.43
% 0.25/1.43 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.25/1.43 # User time : 0.014 s
% 0.25/1.43 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.25/1.43 # Maximum resident set size: 2920 pages
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------