TSTP Solution File: SWW951+1 by CSE_E---1.5

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.5
% Problem  : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep  1 00:19:19 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.19s 0.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   27
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   44 (   8 unt;  21 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   43 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   37 (  17   ~;  15   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   13 (  10   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   18 (  18 usr;  11 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   23 (   8 sgn;  12   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(decl_22,type,
    constr_CONST_0x30: $i ).

tff(decl_23,type,
    constr_CONST_1: $i ).

tff(decl_24,type,
    constr_CONST_2: $i ).

tff(decl_25,type,
    constr_CONST_3: $i ).

tff(decl_26,type,
    constr_CONST_4: $i ).

tff(decl_27,type,
    constr_ZERO: $i ).

tff(decl_28,type,
    name_c: $i ).

tff(decl_29,type,
    name_k: $i ).

tff(decl_30,type,
    name_objective: $i ).

tff(decl_31,type,
    constr_xor: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(decl_32,type,
    pred_attacker: $i > $o ).

tff(decl_33,type,
    tuple_true: $i ).

tff(decl_34,type,
    constr_h: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_35,type,
    tuple_false: $i ).

tff(decl_36,type,
    tuple_T_out_4: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_37,type,
    tuple_T_out_2: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_38,type,
    tuple_T_in_3: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_39,type,
    tuple_T_in_1: $i > $i ).

tff(decl_40,type,
    pred_mess: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_41,type,
    pred_equal: ( $i * $i ) > $o ).

tff(decl_42,type,
    name_new0x2Dname: $i > $i ).

fof(ax64,axiom,
    ! [X26,X27] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X26))
        & pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X27)) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax64) ).

fof(ax49,axiom,
    ! [X15] :
      ( pred_attacker(X15)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X15)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax49) ).

fof(ax51,axiom,
    ! [X17] :
      ( pred_attacker(X17)
     => pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X17)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax51) ).

fof(ax62,axiom,
    ! [X24] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X24)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax62) ).

fof(ax46,axiom,
    ! [X12] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X12))
     => pred_attacker(X12) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax46) ).

fof(co0,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',co0) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X53))
      | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X54))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax64])]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X42] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X42)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X42)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax49])]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_3(X1))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X44] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X44)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X44)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax51])]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_in_1(X1))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X51] : pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X51)),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax62]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_new0x2Dname(X1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X39] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X39))
      | pred_attacker(X39) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax46])]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

fof(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_T_out_4(name_objective)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]),c_0_21]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SWW951+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.00/0.13  % Command    : java -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/mcs_scs.jar %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Sun Aug 27 21:01:37 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.55  start to proof: theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.57  % Version  : CSE_E---1.5
% 0.19/0.57  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % Proof found
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output start Proof
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.008000 s
% 0.19/0.57  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.57  % Total time : 0.011000 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------