TSTP Solution File: SWW949+1 by E-SAT---3.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1
% Problem  : SWW949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 2400s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Oct 10 20:12:01 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :   16
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   62 (  31 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  104 (  15 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   76 (  34   ~;  32   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   13 (  13 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   71 (   2 sgn;  38   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(ax81,axiom,
    ! [X5,X6,X7] : constr_xor(X5,constr_xor(X6,X7)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X5,X6),X7),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax81) ).

fof(ax80,axiom,
    ! [X3,X4] : constr_xor(X3,X4) = constr_xor(X4,X3),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax80) ).

fof(ax79,axiom,
    ! [X2] : constr_xor(X2,constr_ZERO) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax79) ).

fof(ax122,axiom,
    ! [X45] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X45,constr_f(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(X45,name_t)),name_t)))
     => pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax122) ).

fof(ax104,axiom,
    ! [X32,X33] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X32)
        & pred_attacker(X33) )
     => pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X32,X33)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax104) ).

fof(ax78,axiom,
    ! [X1] : constr_xor(X1,X1) = constr_ZERO,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax78) ).

fof(ax103,axiom,
    ! [X31] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(X31))
     => pred_attacker(X31) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax103) ).

fof(ax82,axiom,
    ! [X8,X9] :
      ( ( pred_attacker(X8)
        & pred_attacker(X9) )
     => pred_attacker(constr_xor(X8,X9)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax82) ).

fof(ax120,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(name_r1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax120) ).

fof(ax88,axiom,
    ! [X16,X17] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X16,X17))
     => pred_attacker(X17) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax88) ).

fof(ax118,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(constr_xor(name_t,name_r2_from_1st),constr_f(constr_xor(name_r1_from_1st,name_r2_from_1st),name_t))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax118) ).

fof(ax87,axiom,
    ! [X14,X15] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X14,X15))
     => pred_attacker(X14) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax87) ).

fof(ax90,axiom,
    ! [X19] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_1(X19))
     => pred_attacker(X19) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax90) ).

fof(ax117,axiom,
    pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_1(name_r1_from_1st)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax117) ).

fof(ax99,axiom,
    ! [X27] :
      ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(X27))
     => pred_attacker(X27) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',ax99) ).

fof(co0,conjecture,
    pred_attacker(name_objective),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p',co0) ).

fof(c_0_16,plain,
    ! [X50,X51,X52] : constr_xor(X50,constr_xor(X51,X52)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X50,X51),X52),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax81]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X48,X49] : constr_xor(X48,X49) = constr_xor(X49,X48),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax80]) ).

fof(c_0_18,plain,
    ! [X47] : constr_xor(X47,constr_ZERO) = X47,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax79]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X90] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X90,constr_f(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(X90,name_t)),name_t)))
      | pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax122])]) ).

fof(c_0_20,plain,
    ! [X77,X78] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X77)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X78)
      | pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X77,X78)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax104])]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)) = constr_xor(constr_xor(X1,X2),X3),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,X2) = constr_xor(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X46] : constr_xor(X46,X46) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ax78]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_ZERO) = X1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X1,constr_f(constr_xor(name_r1,constr_xor(X1,name_t)),name_t))) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_in_2(X1,X2))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)) = constr_xor(X2,constr_xor(X3,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,X1) = constr_ZERO,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    constr_xor(constr_ZERO,X1) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_22]) ).

fof(c_0_30,plain,
    ! [X76] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(X76))
      | pred_attacker(X76) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax103])]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_f(constr_xor(name_t,constr_xor(name_r1,X1)),name_t))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X1,X2)) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

fof(c_0_33,plain,
    ! [X53,X54] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(X53)
      | ~ pred_attacker(X54)
      | pred_attacker(constr_xor(X53,X54)) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax82])]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_1(name_r1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax120]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_f(constr_xor(name_t,X1),name_t))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_r1,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_r1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

fof(c_0_39,plain,
    ! [X61,X62] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X61,X62))
      | pred_attacker(X62) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax88])]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(constr_xor(name_t,name_r2_from_1st),constr_f(constr_xor(name_r1_from_1st,name_r2_from_1st),name_t))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax118]) ).

fof(c_0_41,plain,
    ! [X59,X60] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X59,X60))
      | pred_attacker(X59) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax87])]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_f(constr_xor(name_t,X1),name_t))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]),c_0_38])]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X2)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(constr_xor(name_t,name_r2_from_1st),constr_f(constr_xor(name_r2_from_1st,name_r1_from_1st),name_t))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_2(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_41]) ).

fof(c_0_46,plain,
    ! [X64] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_1(X64))
      | pred_attacker(X64) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax90])]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_f(X1,name_t))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_t,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_f(constr_xor(name_r2_from_1st,name_r1_from_1st),name_t)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,constr_xor(X2,X3)))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(X1,X2))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_t,name_r2_from_1st)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_1(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_knowledge_from_1st_round_out_1(name_r1_from_1st)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[ax117]) ).

fof(c_0_53,plain,
    ! [X72] :
      ( ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(X72))
      | pred_attacker(X72) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[ax99])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective))
    | ~ pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_t,constr_xor(name_r2_from_1st,name_r1_from_1st))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_47,c_0_48]) ).

cnf(c_0_55,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(constr_xor(name_t,constr_xor(name_r2_from_1st,X1)))
    | ~ pred_attacker(X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50]) ).

cnf(c_0_56,plain,
    pred_attacker(name_r1_from_1st),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]) ).

fof(c_0_57,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[co0])]) ).

cnf(c_0_58,plain,
    ( pred_attacker(X1)
    | ~ pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(X1)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_53]) ).

cnf(c_0_59,plain,
    pred_attacker(tuple_R_out_4(name_objective)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_54,c_0_55]),c_0_56])]) ).

cnf(c_0_60,negated_conjecture,
    ~ pred_attacker(name_objective),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_57]) ).

cnf(c_0_61,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_58,c_0_59]),c_0_60]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.09  % Problem    : SWW949+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v7.4.0.
% 0.09/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.30  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.30  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.30  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.30  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.30  % CPULimit   : 2400
% 0.09/0.30  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.30  % DateTime   : Mon Oct  2 22:31:41 EDT 2023
% 0.09/0.30  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order model finding
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.9nhwTNNrSb/E---3.1_13805.p
% 0.14/0.45  # Version: 3.1pre001
% 0.14/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 13907 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.14/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  # Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_100_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 797s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting H----_042_B03_F1_AE_Q4_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_300_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_200_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_PI_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with pid 13915 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI
% 0.14/0.45  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.45  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.14/0.45  # Search class: FHUSM-FFMM21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  # partial match(1): FHUSM-FFMF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.45  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_100_C18_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 797s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S2SI with 151s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.45  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  # Proof found!
% 0.14/0.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.45  # Parsed axioms                        : 124
% 0.14/0.45  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Initial clauses                      : 124
% 0.14/0.45  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 124
% 0.14/0.45  # Processed clauses                    : 791
% 0.14/0.45  # ...of these trivial                  : 14
% 0.14/0.45  # ...subsumed                          : 394
% 0.14/0.45  # ...remaining for further processing  : 383
% 0.14/0.45  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Backward-subsumed                    : 2
% 0.14/0.45  # Backward-rewritten                   : 22
% 0.14/0.45  # Generated clauses                    : 1757
% 0.14/0.45  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1452
% 0.14/0.45  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Paramodulations                      : 1757
% 0.14/0.45  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Total rewrite steps                  : 1433
% 0.14/0.45  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.45  # Current number of processed clauses  : 235
% 0.14/0.45  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 29
% 0.14/0.45  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.14/0.45  #    Negative unit clauses             : 79
% 0.14/0.45  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 124
% 0.14/0.45  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 888
% 0.14/0.45  # ...number of literals in the above   : 2309
% 0.14/0.45  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Current number of archived clauses   : 148
% 0.14/0.45  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 11762
% 0.14/0.45  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 10571
% 0.14/0.45  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 365
% 0.14/0.45  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 940
% 0.14/0.45  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 58
% 0.14/0.45  # BW rewrite match successes           : 40
% 0.14/0.45  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.45  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 23993
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  # User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.14/0.45  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.14/0.45  # Total time               : 0.036 s
% 0.14/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1956 pages
% 0.14/0.45  
% 0.14/0.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.45  # User time                : 0.151 s
% 0.14/0.45  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 0.14/0.45  # Total time               : 0.169 s
% 0.14/0.45  # Maximum resident set size: 1780 pages
% 0.14/0.45  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------