TSTP Solution File: SWW938+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW938+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:44 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.08s 300.31s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWW938+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 15:30:50 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.41 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.41 The process was started by sandbox on n024.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.41 Sun Jun 5 15:30:50 2022
% 0.13/0.41 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 32706.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.41 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.41 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=22.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.41 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.41 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.41 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.13/0.41 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.13/0.41 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.13/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.13/0.41 20 back subsumes 18.
% 0.13/0.41 20 back subsumes 17.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 114 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 114 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 114 during input processing: 0 [unit_del,1] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 119 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|s__02(cbool__00,B)=s__02(cbool__00,C)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C)).
% 0.13/0.41 114 back subsumes 6.
% 0.13/0.41 114 back subsumes 5.
% 0.13/0.41 119 back subsumes 113.
% 0.13/0.41 119 back subsumes 21.
% 0.13/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 125 during input processing: 0 [copy,125,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.41 125 back subsumes 112.
% 0.13/0.41 125 back subsumes 7.
% 0.13/0.41
% 0.13/0.41 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.48 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.28/1.48
% 1.28/1.49 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.28/1.49 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.28/1.49 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.28/1.49 number of clauses in intial UL: 68
% 1.28/1.49 number of clauses initially in problem: 80
% 1.28/1.49 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 85
% 1.28/1.49 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 1.28/1.49 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 1.28/1.49 absolute distinct symbol count: 97
% 1.28/1.49 distinct predicate count: 2
% 1.28/1.49 distinct function count: 81
% 1.28/1.49 distinct constant count: 14
% 1.28/1.49
% 1.28/1.49 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.28/1.49
% 1.28/1.49
% 1.28/1.49
% 1.28/1.49 =========== start of search ===========
% 52.91/53.10
% 52.91/53.10
% 52.91/53.10 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 52.91/53.10
% 52.91/53.10 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 105 givens.
% 52.91/53.10
% 80.93/81.15
% 80.93/81.15
% 80.93/81.15 Changing weight limit from 58 to 56.
% 80.93/81.15
% 80.93/81.15 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 110 givens.
% 80.93/81.15
% 92.02/92.28
% 92.02/92.28
% 92.02/92.28 Changing weight limit from 56 to 54.
% 92.02/92.28
% 92.02/92.28 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 115 givens.
% 92.02/92.28
% 110.50/110.77
% 110.50/110.77
% 110.50/110.77 Changing weight limit from 54 to 53.
% 110.50/110.77
% 110.50/110.77 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 130 givens.
% 110.50/110.77
% 145.79/146.00
% 145.79/146.00
% 145.79/146.00 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 145.79/146.00
% 145.79/146.00 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 155 givens.
% 145.79/146.00
% 161.80/162.03
% 161.80/162.03
% 161.80/162.03 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 161.80/162.03
% 161.80/162.03 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 185 givens.
% 161.80/162.03
% 300.08/300.31 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------