TSTP Solution File: SWW930+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:43 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.07s 300.25s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : SWW930+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 18:13:30 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36 Sat Jun 4 18:13:30 2022
% 0.20/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 15005.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=3.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 16 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.20/0.36 16 back subsumes 4.
% 0.20/0.36 16 back subsumes 3.
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 27 during input processing: 0 [copy,27,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36 27 back subsumes 5.
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 18 during input processing: 0 [copy,28,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),A),c_27const_2epair_2eUNCURRY_27__01(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),D))),s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(B,E),s__02(C,F)))))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(C,A),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),D),s__02(B,E))),s__02(C,F))).
% 0.20/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 29 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3)),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3)),c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3))),c_27const_2estack__alloc_2eprog__comp_27__00),s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3)),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),s__02(c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3),B)))))=s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3)),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3),c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3))),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,cfun__02(c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3),c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3)))),$c1),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A))),s__02(c_27type_2estackLang_2eprog_27__01($c3),B))).
% 0.20/0.36
% 0.20/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.41/0.58 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.41/0.58 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.41/0.58 number of clauses in intial UL: 11
% 0.41/0.58 number of clauses initially in problem: 22
% 0.41/0.58 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 50
% 0.41/0.58 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 71
% 0.41/0.58 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 95
% 0.41/0.58 absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.41/0.58 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.41/0.58 distinct function count: 17
% 0.41/0.58 distinct constant count: 9
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58
% 0.41/0.58 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Changing weight limit from 60 to 73.
% 0.41/0.59
% 0.41/0.59 Resetting weight limit to 73 after 5 givens.
% 0.41/0.59
% 13.60/13.84
% 13.60/13.84
% 13.60/13.84 Changing weight limit from 73 to 67.
% 13.60/13.84
% 13.60/13.84 Resetting weight limit to 67 after 85 givens.
% 13.60/13.84
% 30.14/30.38
% 30.14/30.38
% 30.14/30.38 Changing weight limit from 67 to 60.
% 30.14/30.38
% 30.14/30.38 Resetting weight limit to 60 after 90 givens.
% 30.14/30.38
% 42.88/43.10
% 42.88/43.10
% 42.88/43.10 Changing weight limit from 60 to 57.
% 42.88/43.10
% 42.88/43.10 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 95 givens.
% 42.88/43.10
% 47.62/47.84
% 47.62/47.84
% 47.62/47.84 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 47.62/47.84
% 47.62/47.84 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 100 givens.
% 47.62/47.84
% 51.25/51.47
% 51.25/51.47
% 51.25/51.47 Changing weight limit from 56 to 54.
% 51.25/51.47
% 51.25/51.47 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 105 givens.
% 51.25/51.47
% 58.57/58.75
% 58.57/58.75
% 58.57/58.75 Changing weight limit from 54 to 53.
% 58.57/58.75
% 58.57/58.75 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 110 givens.
% 58.57/58.75
% 71.80/71.98
% 71.80/71.98
% 71.80/71.98 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 71.80/71.98
% 71.80/71.98 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 115 givens.
% 71.80/71.98
% 129.74/129.98
% 129.74/129.98
% 129.74/129.98 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 129.74/129.98
% 129.74/129.98 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 150 givens.
% 129.74/129.98
% 142.72/142.95
% 142.72/142.95
% 142.72/142.95 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 142.72/142.95
% 142.72/142.95 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 170 givens.
% 142.72/142.95
% 170.72/170.89
% 170.72/170.89
% 170.72/170.89 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 170.72/170.89
% 170.72/170.89 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 185 givens.
% 170.72/170.89
% 193.82/194.00
% 193.82/194.00
% 193.82/194.00 Changing weight limit from 49 to 48.
% 193.82/194.00
% 193.82/194.00 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 190 givens.
% 193.82/194.00
% 300.07/300.25 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------