TSTP Solution File: SWW918+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW918+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:42 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.11s 300.40s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.13  % Problem  : SWW918+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Sun Jun  5 05:12:32 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.22/0.39  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.39  The process was started by sandbox on n025.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.39  Sun Jun  5 05:12:32 2022
% 0.22/0.39  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 13727.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.39  set(auto).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.39  clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=5.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.22/0.39  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.22/0.39  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.22/0.39  clauses in usable.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.22/0.39  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.22/0.39  paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.22/0.39     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,C)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 11 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 22 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.22/0.39  22 back subsumes 3.
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,24,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D))).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 30 during input processing: 0 [copy,30,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B)))=s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A))).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,46,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.39  46 back subsumes 24.
% 0.22/0.39  46 back subsumes 21.
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [copy,47,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,C)))))=s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2earithmetic_2e_2b_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,C))).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 38 during input processing: 0 [copy,48,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eAPPEND_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02(s__02(A,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C))),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),D)))=s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02(s__02(A,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eAPPEND_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),D))))).
% 0.22/0.39    Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,49,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eMAP_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(B),c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02(s__02(B,D),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(B),E)))))=s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02(s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D))),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eMAP_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(B),E))))).
% 0.22/0.39  
% 0.22/0.39  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.59/0.79  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.59/0.79  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.59/0.79  number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.59/0.79  number of clauses initially in problem: 45
% 0.59/0.79  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 40
% 0.59/0.79  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 97
% 0.59/0.79  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 97
% 0.59/0.79  absolute distinct symbol count: 37
% 0.59/0.79     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.59/0.79     distinct function count: 19
% 0.59/0.79     distinct constant count: 16
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  Changing weight limit from 60 to 99.
% 0.59/0.79  
% 0.59/0.79  Resetting weight limit to 99 after 5 givens.
% 0.59/0.79  
% 265.38/265.70  
% 265.38/265.70  
% 265.38/265.70  Changing weight limit from 99 to 98.
% 265.38/265.70  
% 265.38/265.70  Resetting weight limit to 98 after 95 givens.
% 265.38/265.70  
% 300.11/300.40  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------