TSTP Solution File: SWW906+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW906+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:41 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.05s 300.23s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : SWW906+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n021.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 17:03:04 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36 The process was started by sandbox2 on n021.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36 Sun Jun 5 17:03:04 2022
% 0.13/0.36 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 16102.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=5.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.36 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.36 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.36 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.13/0.36 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.13/0.36 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [copy,25,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),C),s__02(B,D))).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 56 during input processing: 0 [copy,56,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36 56 back subsumes 25.
% 0.13/0.36 56 back subsumes 20.
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [copy,57,flip.1] {-} s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2elist_2eLENGTH_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eCONS_27__02(s__02(A,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C)))))=s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2enum_2eSUC_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2elist_2eLENGTH_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C))))).
% 0.13/0.36 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [copy,58,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),A),c_27const_2elist_2eEL_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2enum_2eSUC_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))))),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),A),c_27const_2elist_2eEL_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eTL_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),C))))).
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.58 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.58
% 0.20/0.59 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.59 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.59 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.59 number of clauses in intial UL: 19
% 0.20/0.59 number of clauses initially in problem: 50
% 0.20/0.59 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 38
% 0.20/0.59 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 79
% 0.20/0.59 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.59 absolute distinct symbol count: 29
% 0.20/0.59 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.20/0.59 distinct function count: 16
% 0.20/0.59 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 Changing weight limit from 60 to 69.
% 0.20/0.59
% 0.20/0.59 Resetting weight limit to 69 after 5 givens.
% 0.20/0.59
% 300.05/300.23 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------