TSTP Solution File: SWW901+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW901+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:40 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.07s 300.31s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW901+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun Jun 5 06:43:48 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.41 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.41 The process was started by sandbox2 on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.41 Sun Jun 5 06:43:48 2022
% 0.14/0.41 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 12731.
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.41 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.41 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=7.
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.41 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.41 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.41 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.41 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.14/0.41 12 back subsumes 3.
% 0.14/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 26 during input processing: 0 [copy,26,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.41 26 back subsumes 4.
% 0.14/0.41 Following clause subsumed by 23 during input processing: 0 [copy,28,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),A),c_27const_2epair_2eUNCURRY_27__01(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),D))),s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(B,E),s__02(C,F)))))=s__02(A,c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(C,A),c_27const_2ebool_2eLET_27__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),D),s__02(B,E))),s__02(C,F))).
% 0.14/0.41
% 0.14/0.41 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.46/0.65 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.46/0.65 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses in intial UL: 2
% 0.46/0.65 number of clauses initially in problem: 15
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 13
% 0.46/0.65 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 67
% 0.46/0.65 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 93
% 0.46/0.65 absolute distinct symbol count: 37
% 0.46/0.65 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.46/0.65 distinct function count: 23
% 0.46/0.65 distinct constant count: 12
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 =========== start of search ===========
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 16.26/16.49
% 16.26/16.49 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 110 givens.
% 16.26/16.49
% 20.01/20.19
% 20.01/20.19
% 20.01/20.19 Changing weight limit from 58 to 57.
% 20.01/20.19
% 20.01/20.19 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 115 givens.
% 20.01/20.19
% 24.13/24.38
% 24.13/24.38
% 24.13/24.38 Changing weight limit from 57 to 56.
% 24.13/24.38
% 24.13/24.38 Resetting weight limit to 56 after 120 givens.
% 24.13/24.38
% 27.81/27.98
% 27.81/27.98
% 27.81/27.98 Changing weight limit from 56 to 54.
% 27.81/27.98
% 27.81/27.98 Resetting weight limit to 54 after 125 givens.
% 27.81/27.98
% 38.72/38.90
% 38.72/38.90
% 38.72/38.90 Changing weight limit from 54 to 53.
% 38.72/38.90
% 38.72/38.90 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 140 givens.
% 38.72/38.90
% 41.23/41.41
% 41.23/41.41
% 41.23/41.41 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 41.23/41.41
% 41.23/41.41 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 145 givens.
% 41.23/41.41
% 46.83/47.07
% 46.83/47.07
% 46.83/47.07 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 46.83/47.07
% 46.83/47.07 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 150 givens.
% 46.83/47.07
% 81.72/81.90
% 81.72/81.90
% 81.72/81.90 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 81.72/81.90
% 81.72/81.90 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 175 givens.
% 81.72/81.90
% 91.32/91.50
% 91.32/91.50
% 91.32/91.50 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 91.32/91.50
% 91.32/91.50 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 185 givens.
% 91.32/91.50
% 133.03/133.25
% 133.03/133.25
% 133.03/133.25 Changing weight limit from 49 to 48.
% 133.03/133.25
% 133.03/133.25 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 235 givens.
% 133.03/133.25
% 300.07/300.31 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------