TSTP Solution File: SWW899+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW899+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unknown 2.51s 2.69s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem  : SWW899+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.11/0.11  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.16/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.16/0.31  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 20:16:33 EDT 2022
% 0.16/0.31  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.33  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.16/0.33  The process was started by sandbox on n032.cluster.edu,
% 0.16/0.33  Sat Jun  4 20:16:33 2022
% 0.16/0.33  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 6282.
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.16/0.33  set(auto).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.16/0.33  clear(print_given).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  formula_list(usable).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=5.
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.16/0.33  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.16/0.33  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.16/0.33  clauses in usable.
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.16/0.33  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.16/0.33  paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.16/0.33     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  ------------> process usable:
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  ------------> process sos:
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 21 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 35 during input processing: 0 [copy,35,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 28 during input processing: 0 [copy,36,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2epair_2epair__CASE_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(B,D),s__02(C,E))),s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(C,A),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F),s__02(B,D))),s__02(C,E))).
% 0.16/0.33    Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [copy,37,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2earithmetic_2enum__CASE_27__03(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,c_27const_2enum_2eSUC_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))),s__02(A,C),s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),D)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),D),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))).
% 0.16/0.33  
% 0.16/0.33  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.16/0.50  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.16/0.50  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.16/0.50  number of clauses in intial UL: 18
% 0.16/0.50  number of clauses initially in problem: 34
% 0.16/0.50  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 52
% 0.16/0.50  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 67
% 0.16/0.50  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 97
% 0.16/0.50  absolute distinct symbol count: 28
% 0.16/0.50     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.16/0.50     distinct function count: 16
% 0.16/0.50     distinct constant count: 10
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  
% 0.16/0.50  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.51/2.69  
% 2.51/2.69  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.51/2.69  
% 2.51/2.69  
% 2.51/2.69  Search stopped because sos empty.
% 2.51/2.69  
% 2.51/2.69  ============ end of search ============
% 2.51/2.69  
% 2.51/2.69  Process 6282 finished Sat Jun  4 20:16:35 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------