TSTP Solution File: SWW898+1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SWW898+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:40 EDT 2022

% Result   : Timeout 300.03s 300.22s
% Output   : None 
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : SWW898+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jun  4 16:41:09 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.38  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.18/0.38  The process was started by sandbox on n023.cluster.edu,
% 0.18/0.38  Sat Jun  4 16:41:10 2022
% 0.18/0.38  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 5226.
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.18/0.38  set(auto).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.18/0.38  clear(print_given).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  formula_list(usable).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=12.
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.18/0.38  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.18/0.38  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.18/0.38  clauses in usable.
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.18/0.38  assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.18/0.38  paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.18/0.38     dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ------------> process usable:
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [factor_simp] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00)).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 7 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 15 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.18/0.38  36 back subsumes 26.
% 0.18/0.38  37 back subsumes 27.
% 0.18/0.38  40 back subsumes 30.
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ------------> process sos:
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 82 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.18/0.38  82 back subsumes 5.
% 0.18/0.38  82 back subsumes 4.
% 0.18/0.38  94 back subsumes 93.
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 102 during input processing: 0 [copy,102,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.18/0.38  102 back subsumes 79.
% 0.18/0.38  102 back subsumes 6.
% 0.18/0.38    Following clause subsumed by 92 during input processing: 0 [copy,103,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2eoption_2eoption__CASE_27__03(s__02(c_27type_2eoption_2eoption_27__01(B),c_27const_2eoption_2eSOME_27__01(s__02(B,C))),s__02(A,D),s__02(cfun__02(B,A),E)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),E),s__02(B,C))).
% 0.18/0.38  
% 0.18/0.38  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.51  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.51  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.51  number of clauses in intial UL: 71
% 0.18/0.51  number of clauses initially in problem: 90
% 0.18/0.51  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 78
% 0.18/0.51  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 45
% 0.18/0.51  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 97
% 0.18/0.51  absolute distinct symbol count: 175
% 0.18/0.51     distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.18/0.51     distinct function count: 151
% 0.18/0.51     distinct constant count: 22
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  
% 0.18/0.51  =========== start of search ===========
% 300.03/300.22  Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------