TSTP Solution File: SWW893+1 by ePrincess---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ePrincess---1.0
% Problem  : SWW893+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 00:04:46 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 266.16s 201.41s
% Output   : Assurance 0s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SWW893+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : ePrincess-casc -timeout=%d %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun  6 04:47:05 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.50/0.59          ____       _                          
% 0.50/0.59    ___  / __ \_____(_)___  ________  __________
% 0.50/0.59   / _ \/ /_/ / ___/ / __ \/ ___/ _ \/ ___/ ___/
% 0.50/0.59  /  __/ ____/ /  / / / / / /__/  __(__  |__  ) 
% 0.50/0.59  \___/_/   /_/  /_/_/ /_/\___/\___/____/____/  
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  A Theorem Prover for First-Order Logic
% 0.50/0.59  (ePrincess v.1.0)
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  (c) Philipp Rümmer, 2009-2015
% 0.50/0.59  (c) Peter Backeman, 2014-2015
% 0.50/0.59  (contributions by Angelo Brillout, Peter Baumgartner)
% 0.50/0.59  Free software under GNU Lesser General Public License (LGPL).
% 0.50/0.59  Bug reports to peter@backeman.se
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  For more information, visit http://user.uu.se/~petba168/breu/
% 0.50/0.59  
% 0.50/0.59  Loading /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 0.72/0.64  Prover 0: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 3.14/1.29  Prover 0: Preprocessing ...
% 8.52/2.49  Prover 0: Constructing countermodel ...
% 17.42/5.93  Prover 1: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 18.13/6.14  Prover 1: Preprocessing ...
% 19.64/6.49  Prover 1: Constructing countermodel ...
% 25.61/7.90  Prover 1: gave up
% 25.61/7.90  Prover 2: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 26.47/8.08  Prover 2: Preprocessing ...
% 31.00/9.26  Prover 2: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 31.22/9.31  Prover 2: Constructing countermodel ...
% 40.01/11.70  Prover 3: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 40.80/11.90  Prover 3: Preprocessing ...
% 41.77/12.14  Prover 3: Constructing countermodel ...
% 44.36/13.01  Prover 3: gave up
% 44.36/13.01  Prover 4: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=complete
% 44.97/13.16  Prover 4: Preprocessing ...
% 49.59/14.60  Prover 4: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 49.59/14.64  Prover 4: Constructing countermodel ...
% 54.57/17.09  Prover 0: stopped
% 54.70/17.29  Prover 5: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 54.96/17.45  Prover 5: Preprocessing ...
% 55.56/17.66  Prover 5: Constructing countermodel ...
% 69.57/29.37  Prover 5: stopped
% 69.75/29.57  Prover 6: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 69.94/29.72  Prover 6: Preprocessing ...
% 71.34/30.56  Prover 6: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 71.55/30.60  Prover 6: Constructing countermodel ...
% 140.32/95.25  Prover 2: stopped
% 140.58/95.45  Prover 7: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximalOutermost -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 140.78/95.62  Prover 7: Preprocessing ...
% 141.32/95.81  Prover 7: Constructing countermodel ...
% 143.41/96.61  Prover 7: gave up
% 143.41/96.61  Prover 8: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 143.77/96.73  Prover 8: Preprocessing ...
% 143.98/96.88  Prover 8: Constructing countermodel ...
% 145.72/97.64  Prover 8: gave up
% 145.72/97.64  Prover 9: Options:  -triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMinimal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=completeFrugal
% 145.89/97.76  Prover 9: Preprocessing ...
% 146.65/98.04  Prover 9: Proving ...
% 169.36/115.46  Prover 9: stopped
% 169.61/115.66  Prover 10: Options:  -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allMaximal -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 169.94/115.83  Prover 10: Preprocessing ...
% 171.46/116.18  Prover 10: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 171.46/116.20  Prover 10: Constructing countermodel ...
% 219.58/160.39  Prover 10: stopped
% 219.79/160.59  Prover 11: Options:  +triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple +reverseFunctionalityPropagation +boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=nonUnifying +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 220.10/160.76  Prover 11: Preprocessing ...
% 220.72/160.98  Prover 11: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 220.72/161.00  Prover 11: Constructing countermodel ...
% 222.78/161.81  Prover 11: gave up
% 222.78/161.81  Prover 12: Options:  +triggersInConjecture -genTotalityAxioms +tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=simple -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=maximal -resolutionMethod=normal -ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 222.93/161.91  Prover 12: Preprocessing ...
% 223.13/162.09  Prover 12: Constructing countermodel ...
% 225.17/162.81  Prover 12: gave up
% 225.17/162.81  Prover 13: Options:  -triggersInConjecture +genTotalityAxioms -tightFunctionScopes -clausifier=none -reverseFunctionalityPropagation -boolFunsAsPreds -triggerStrategy=allUni -resolutionMethod=normal +ignoreQuantifiers -generateTriggers=all
% 225.28/162.92  Prover 13: Preprocessing ...
% 225.87/163.35  Prover 13: Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
% 225.87/163.38  Prover 13: Constructing countermodel ...
% 266.16/201.41  Prover 13: proved (38601ms)
% 266.16/201.41  Prover 4: stopped
% 266.16/201.41  Prover 6: stopped
% 266.16/201.41  
% 266.16/201.41  No countermodel exists, formula is valid
% 266.16/201.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 266.16/201.41  
% 266.16/201.41  Generating proof ... Warning: ignoring some quantifiers
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------