TSTP Solution File: SWW891+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW891+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 294.83s 295.08s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13 % Problem : SWW891+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.07/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.36 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.36 % DateTime : Sat Jun 4 13:26:33 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.14/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n029.cluster.edu,
% 0.14/0.39 Sat Jun 4 13:26:33 2022
% 0.14/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 23159.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.14/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.14/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.14/0.39 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.14/0.39 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.14/0.39 clauses in usable.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.14/0.39 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.14/0.39 9 back subsumes 3.
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 20 during input processing: 0 [copy,20,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.14/0.39 20 back subsumes 4.
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 14 during input processing: 0 [copy,21,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2epair_2epair__CASE_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(B,D),s__02(C,E))),s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(C,A),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F),s__02(B,D))),s__02(C,E))).
% 0.14/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 19 during input processing: 0 [copy,22,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2eoption_2eoption__CASE_27__03(s__02(c_27type_2eoption_2eoption_27__01(B),c_27const_2eoption_2eSOME_27__01(s__02(B,C))),s__02(A,D),s__02(cfun__02(B,A),E)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,A),E),s__02(B,C))).
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.76/0.95 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.76/0.95 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.76/0.95 number of clauses in intial UL: 5
% 0.76/0.95 number of clauses initially in problem: 17
% 0.76/0.95 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 29
% 0.76/0.95 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 90
% 0.76/0.95 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 88
% 0.76/0.95 absolute distinct symbol count: 41
% 0.76/0.95 distinct predicate count: 2
% 0.76/0.95 distinct function count: 28
% 0.76/0.95 distinct constant count: 11
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95
% 0.76/0.95 =========== start of search ===========
% 127.13/127.30
% 127.13/127.30
% 127.13/127.30 Changing weight limit from 60 to 58.
% 127.13/127.30
% 127.13/127.30 Resetting weight limit to 58 after 115 givens.
% 127.13/127.30
% 131.45/131.63
% 131.45/131.63
% 131.45/131.63 Changing weight limit from 58 to 57.
% 131.45/131.63
% 131.45/131.63 Resetting weight limit to 57 after 120 givens.
% 131.45/131.63
% 147.71/147.96
% 147.71/147.96
% 147.71/147.96 Changing weight limit from 57 to 53.
% 147.71/147.96
% 147.71/147.96 Resetting weight limit to 53 after 125 givens.
% 147.71/147.96
% 156.94/157.13
% 156.94/157.13
% 156.94/157.13 Changing weight limit from 53 to 52.
% 156.94/157.13
% 156.94/157.13 Resetting weight limit to 52 after 130 givens.
% 156.94/157.13
% 167.23/167.40
% 167.23/167.40
% 167.23/167.40 Changing weight limit from 52 to 51.
% 167.23/167.40
% 167.23/167.40 Resetting weight limit to 51 after 140 givens.
% 167.23/167.40
% 273.43/273.60
% 273.43/273.60
% 273.43/273.60 Changing weight limit from 51 to 50.
% 273.43/273.60
% 273.43/273.60 Resetting weight limit to 50 after 190 givens.
% 273.43/273.60
% 276.22/276.40
% 276.22/276.40
% 276.22/276.40 Changing weight limit from 50 to 49.
% 276.22/276.40
% 276.22/276.40 Resetting weight limit to 49 after 195 givens.
% 276.22/276.40
% 294.83/295.08
% 294.83/295.08
% 294.83/295.08 Changing weight limit from 49 to 48.
% 294.83/295.08
% 294.83/295.08 Resetting weight limit to 48 after 220 givens.
% 294.83/295.08
% 300.03/300.22 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------