TSTP Solution File: SWW863+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : SWW863+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Thu Jul 21 01:27:37 EDT 2022
% Result : Timeout 300.02s 300.21s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.13 % Problem : SWW863+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.3.0.
% 0.12/0.13 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Jun 6 03:37:01 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.37 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.37 The process was started by sandbox on n017.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.37 Mon Jun 6 03:37:01 2022
% 0.13/0.37 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 9420.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.37 set(auto).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.37 clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 formula_list(usable).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=1, max_lits=9.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 This ia a non-Horn set with equality. The strategy will be
% 0.13/0.37 Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.13/0.37 unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.13/0.37 clauses in usable.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: set(factor).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 There is a clause for symmetry of equality, so it is
% 0.13/0.37 assumed that equality is fully axiomatized; therefore,
% 0.13/0.37 paramodulation is disabled.
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_from).
% 0.13/0.37 dependent: clear(para_into).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 1 during input processing: 0 [] {-} -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cF__00))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,A)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 4 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(A,B)=s__02(A,C)|s__02(A,C)!=s__02(A,B).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 12 during input processing: 0 [] {-} s__02(cbool__00,A)!=s__02(cbool__00,B)|s__02(cbool__00,C)!=s__02(cbool__00,D)| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,C))| -p__01(s__02(cbool__00,B))|p__01(s__02(cbool__00,D)).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 31 during input processing: 0 [] {-} p__01(s__02(cbool__00,cT__00)).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [copy,50,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.37 50 back subsumes 28.
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 40 during input processing: 0 [copy,51,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2epair_2epair__CASE_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2epair_2eprod_27__02(B,C),c_27const_2epair_2e_2c_27__02(s__02(B,D),s__02(C,E))),s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(C,A),chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(B,cfun__02(C,A)),F),s__02(B,D))),s__02(C,E))).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 41 during input processing: 0 [copy,52,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2elist_2eEL_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),c_27const_2elist_2eLUPDATE_27__03(s__02(A,C),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,D),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),E)))))=s__02(A,c_27const_2ebool_2eCOND_27__03(s__02(cbool__00,$f2(A,E,C,B,D)),s__02(A,C),s__02(A,c_27const_2elist_2eEL_27__02(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B),s__02(c_27type_2elist_2elist_27__01(A),E))))).
% 0.13/0.37 Following clause subsumed by 42 during input processing: 0 [copy,53,flip.1] {-} s__02(A,c_27const_2ereg__alloc_2etag__CASE_27__04(s__02(c_27type_2ereg__alloc_2etag_27__00,c_27const_2ereg__alloc_2eFixed_27__01(s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))),s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),C),s__02(A,D),s__02(A,E)))=s__02(A,chapp__02(s__02(cfun__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,A),C),s__02(c_27type_2enum_2enum_27__00,B))).
% 0.13/0.37
% 0.13/0.37 ======= end of input processing =======
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 Failed to model usable list: disabling FINDER
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 1.71/1.91 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 1.71/1.91 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 1.71/1.91 number of clauses in intial UL: 28
% 1.71/1.91 number of clauses initially in problem: 50
% 1.71/1.91 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 56
% 1.71/1.91 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 91
% 1.71/1.91 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 1.71/1.91 absolute distinct symbol count: 48
% 1.71/1.91 distinct predicate count: 2
% 1.71/1.91 distinct function count: 36
% 1.71/1.91 distinct constant count: 10
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91
% 1.71/1.91 =========== start of search ===========
% 300.02/300.21 Wow, sos-wrapper got a signal XCPU
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------